Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Governor’s choice

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • RBI Governor D. Subbarao will make his second credit policy announcement on Tuesday, January 27. After a series of steps that helped greatly in easing the liquidity crunch that India faced from the middle of September, market expectations about the RBI’s actions have been largely met as the RBI maintained adequate liquidity in the system. However, today with bank lending rate cuts not keeping pace with RBI rate cuts and credit not expanding as policy makers might have hoped, what should Governor Subbarao do? In addition to cutting rates further, he needs to initiate long-pending reforms that would improve the monetary policy transmission mechanism.

    The first question is, should the RBI cut interest rates further? Today there is little disagreement that interest rates need to be lowered further. The real question is whether the RBI should cut rates now, or wait for banks react to its earlier rate cuts. With the latest price data suggesting that the fear of inflation has receded, the concern about a slowdown in growth of output outweighs worries about inflation. There is disagreement on the speed and magnitude of rate cuts. Advocates of gradualism believe that the RBI should wait, just in case inflationary pressures rise again. But today the best policy would be to immediately cut rates sharply.

    Ads by Google

    First, the unfolding of the crisis warrants quick and decisive action. In the past we have seen that the deeper the crisis the longer it takes for the economy to recover. In other words, while we wait and watch and act upon actual data, the economy will continue to deteriorate at a rapid pace. This in turn will make the recovery period slower and longer. India has limited fiscal space and a slow and poor monetary policy transmission mechanism. A 100 basis point cut in the repo rate does not lead to a 100 basis point cut in lending rates immediately. That is why the need for a larger cut in policy rates.

    ... contd.

    Next1234
    Naive AuthorBy: Rishabh Halakhandi | 23-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward Author is foolish enough to suggest 2% interest rate. This kind of low interest rate destroyed US saving rate and caused a house boom. Which finally led to current housing crisis. Our lending is growing at 24% this year but economics shows that lending in the country ideally should not grow more than 2 times the GDP growth rate. Slowdown is part of the business cycle otherwise we will have asset bubbles in out country also and people will suffer much more than few people who would benefit from those asset bubbles. A country with 5% growth rate cannot have 2% interest rates.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.