Meghnad Desai

The idea of Pakistan


Meghnad Desai

Govt, others differ on number of tigers, SC extends tourism ban

Ads by Google

Suspense over the exact number of tigers in India continued in the Supreme Court Wednesday when the Centre and other parties in a case relating to eco-tourism guidelines for the tiger reserves assumed contradictory positions on whether the number of big cats has risen or gone down.

The exactness of the number is significant since the SC has said its ban on tourism in core areas of tiger reserves was passed under an impression that the tiger population had gone down.

Additional Solicitor General Indira Jai Singh had earlier submitted that, as per surveys, there were 1,411 tigers in 2006 and 1,706 in 2010. She reiterated this on Wednesday.

But Chander Uday Singh, appearing for one of the parties, claimed it was wrong to say so. "There is a rise in the number between the two census only because in 2006 census tigers from Sundarbans were not counted," he said. Some parties said the variation in numbers was due to different methods of counting. The ASG said she had reliable data to prove their population had risen and she would submit this to the court.

The court then extended the ban on tourism in core areas, saying it will first hear all the parties. It asked the stakeholders to "have some patience" and assured them it will pass a "balanced order".

Ads by Google
Please read our terms of use before posting comments
TERMS OF USE: The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
comments powered by Disqus