You are here: IE »   Story

Govt, party plan joint statement on Indo-Pak

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    The top leadership of the Congress is set to strongly endorse Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s diplomatic initiative on Pakistan and counter the Opposition as it prepares to step up its campaign against the Egypt joint statement.

    This became clear at the party’s core group meeting tonight where Singh, sources said, explained how and why the joint statement did not undermine any Indian interests. And, instead, gave the Government more flexibility in taking the diplomatic process forward.

    Singh is said to have underlined that dialogue was the only way forward. And that India had conceded no ground by agreeing to include a reference to “threats in Balochistan” or by saying that dialogue should not be bracketed with action on terror.

    The meeting, held at the Prime Minister’s residence, was attended by Congress president Sonia Gandhi, Defence Minister A K Antony, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, Home Minister P Chidambaram and political secretary to Gandhi, Ahmed Patel.

    Ads by Google

    It was decided that the Prime Minister would explain the import of the statement in his intervention in the Lok Sabha on July 29. The next day, Congress president Sonia Gandhi would announce the party’s unequivocal backing to the government at the Congress Parliamentary Party meeting.

    This decision comes after Congress spokespersons have been cautious in their reaction, their refrain being: “there is nothing to add to the joint statement.”

    The core group is also learnt to have discussed the strategy to counter the Opposition’s campaign against this issue. NDA leaders have sought an appointment with President Pratibha Patil to submit a joint memorandum seeking her intervention to “course correct” the UPA’s foreign policy initiatives.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Party's tactical backing wouldn't doBy: K.Vijayakumar | 27-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The adulation showered on Dr.Manmohan Singh by the opinion makers after the recent election seems to have put him on a wrong path which is likely to lead him to serious trouble. The Prime Minister cannot afford to swim against the tide of political opinion with only a cherished economic ideology as his sole navigator. Dr.Singh should realise that governance is multi-dimensional and act accordingly. The Congress party is politically clueless at present and its getting behind him may not help him
    Deteriorating diplomacy----By: romesh.sharma | 25-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Now,that the congress has realized that their anarchic and treacerous policies are caught and there is strong pressure of public opinion they are coming out with silly excuses and making feints.There is no explanation that can alter/defer public anger and mistrust in this Govt.The congress was of the mind that the shame,the repugnance,the remorse and the anger will fade soon for people had elected with blind trust.Once this crime/blunder was accepted they could further continue with this kind of policies of supperession exploiting public trust.Every repetition would have given them courage and freedom to practice real despotic rule.Now is the time that the opposition must keep constant vigilance and pull the reins till this malicious attitude ends or the reins break.No relaxation for the national security,integrity,unity and even freedom is at stake/jeopardized.Congress has misused people and insulted the Nation and they must go.
    Highly Qualified Candidate.By: RN | 25-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Where are all those so called brilliant Indians, who were advocating the ability of Dr. MMS with his top class C.V.? Many others rightly pointed out that he could be a good Economist (Finance Minister) - but many of those advocates forget to remember the simples issue that an organization is not run by a Finance Manager - you still need an able Chairman / Managing Director to take bold decisions and lead the organization. What was the hurry to draft a document and sign it, and it has been proven time
    SOME THING LIKE THE J.P MOVEMENT I N 1975By: Thomas | 25-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward SOME THING LIKE THE JAYAPRAKASH NARAYAN MOVEMENT THAT TOOK PLACE IN THE MID SEVENTIES DURING THE PERIOD OF INDIRA GANDHI SHOULD COME THEN ONLY ONLY THE PRESENT RULERS WILL LEARN A LESSON OR ELSE THEY WILL TAKE THE PEOPLE OF INDIA FOR GRANTED AND WITH THE HELP FROM THE ELECTION COMMISSION WIN ELECTIONS BY MISUSE OF MONEY (MONEY WILL PLAY A KEY ROLE IN THE ELECTIONS LIKE THE ONE IN MAY 2009)IN TAMIL NADU THE D.M.K HAS SPENT 1600 CRORES TO WIN THE RECENTLY CONCLUDED PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS CAN ANY ONE BELIVE BUT IT HAS HAPPENNED.
    LETS BE MATURE!!!By: B.SRIDHAR | 25-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward THE REACTIONS TO THE JOINT STATEMENT BY POLITICOS, PRINT MEDIA AND VISUAL MEDIA HAS BEEN VERY CONFUSING. THE VISUAL MEDIA AS SUCH DOES NOT HAVE A EDITORIAL VIEW. NONE OF THE CHANNELS TAKE A STAND. THEY SIMPLY CALL POLITICIANS AND ACADEMICIANS FOR A DISCUSSION AND CONFUSE THE PUBLIC FURTHER. IN THE FIRST PLACE WE MUST DECIDE WHETHER PAKISTAN IS TRUSTWORTHY. THE ANSWER WILL BE NO. THEN, WHETHER WE HAVE NOT COMMITTED BLUNDERS EARLIER? THE ANSWER IS YES, NOT ONCE BUT TWICE. ONCE IN 1965 AND THE OTHER IN 1972 IN THE DRAFT SHIMLA AGREEMENT. NOW THE THIRD TIME WE HAVE ALLOWED PAK TO INCLUDE REFERENCE TO BALOCH. REACTIONS FROM PAKISTAN HAS ALWAYS BEEN INSTANT WHEN COMES TO INDIA AND WE ALWAYS BLINK TAKE TIME TO REACT. BY THAT TIME PAK WALKS AWAY WITH THE CAKE. THERE IS A NEED TO TALK. WE CANT BE ADAMANT BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE SHOULD NOT YIELD TOO MUCH GROUND! MANMOHAN IS RIGHT IN TALKING TO PAKISTAN BUT WE MUST STAND FIRM ON THE ISSUE OF TERRORISM.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.