Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Govt underlines: Dalai Lama free to visit Arunachal

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Dalai Lama
    Dalai Lama

    Reitrating that Arunachal Pradesh is an “inalienable” part of India, Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao today made it clear that the Tibetan spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama, is free to visit any part of the country.

    The proposed November trip to Arunachal will be the Dalai Lama’s fifth visit to the state, the last one was in 2003.

    Rao, in an interview to All India Radio, said: “We regard and we have always said this clearly and also to China that His Holiness Dalai Lama is a spiritual figure, he is a religious figure, and he does not indulge in political activities on Indian soil and he is our guest in India and he is free to visit any part of our country.”

    China has objected to the proposed visit.

    Referring to the recent exchanges between the two countries, she said: “I can say it with all honesty both governments are convinced that there is no other way to resolve this without dialogue. One has to resolve it through dialogue. I remember our first late Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, speaking to Parliament in 1962 saying, ‘We cannot march to Peking,’ and I am quoting his words.”

    Ads by Google

    Reaffirming India’s position on Chinese objections to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s visit to Arunachal, the Foreign Secretary said: “Of course, we take this (Beijing’s objections) seriously, and we have been very, very particular and very clear and unambivalent in expressing our position to the Chinese. In that way, we have said that Arunachal Pradesh is an integral part of India, it is an inalienable part of India.”

    ... contd.

    Next123
    India's Ethical Reassurances vs Obama's "Strategic Reassurances"By: Chitra KarunaKaran | 19-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward cont.2(above)India's safe haven policy towards the Dalai Lama incurred Chinese aggression on Indian territory in the Northeast in 1962, in which tens of thousands of ill-prepared Indian soldiers lost their lives.Of course there are many geo-political complexities in my narrative but India's strategy of "ethical reassurance" is the exact opposite of Obama's "strategic reassurance."India's safe haven policy towards Tibetans is an example of Gandhian ethics in practice, in politics. How shrewdly ethical, reminiscent of Gandhi's game-changing nonviolent dismantling of the mighty Brit Empire.Of course no one seriously expects a policy of "Ethical Reassurance" from the Chinese -- or from the US for that matter.Obama is no different in substance (only in style and hype) from his other white male forbears in the Whites' House, with the exception of Lincoln.Obama performs Whiteness which is a US dominance ideology, racialized of course, in which ETHICS is consistently trumped by PROFIT -
    Ethical Reassurances vs Obama's "Strategic Reassurances."By: Chithra KarunaKaran EthicalDemocracy | 18-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Ethical Reassurance vs. "Strategic Reassurance"I am going to posit my term "Ethical Reassurance" against Obama's "Strategic Reassurance."Recently, the Indian Government allowed the Dalai Lama to visit Arunachal Pradesh, a border state within the Republic of India, now increasingly stridently disputed by China. The Indian Govt did not hold him back, even at the risk of further sabre-rattling by the expansionist Chinese.Tibetans live in Arunachal Pradesh, as they do in every part of India. The Dalai Lama has every ethical justification, indeed an ethical obligation to visit with Tibetan communities in Arunachal Pradesh.The Chinese government finds intolerable, India's policy of offering safe haven to the Dalai Lama and hundreds of thousands of his fellow Tibetans, a policy that India has steadfastly followed since the late '50s, when the Dalai Lama and his followers fled Chinese oppression in their ancestral homeland.
    24/7 news about china..got anything about the plight of indians living on 5 cents per day??By: Jonathan James | 18-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Indians mostly tend to complain about other’s faults.Can anyone explain why India has rough relationships with all the country it borders??I been to china(urban
    Re:24/7 news about china..got anything about the plight of indians living on 5 cents per day??By: bala | 09-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward As though China doesnt have any issues with its neighbors!!..China has been coercive in resolving its boarder dispute with Vietnam and eastern neighbors.
    Democracy vs. DictatorshipBy: perceive | 20-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Jonathan, the reply to your question is India is a Democracy and China is an authoritarian govt, a global sweatshop nation without a free press or human rights. You sound like the typical, Ugly, uninformed American abroad. There is no doubt that India has a grave malnutrition problem and the Govt. of India is culpable, but that does not mean you should compare apples and oranges. What about China's inhuman 1-child policy? Where are the missing girls? Guess if you eliminate them you don't have to feed them! A humane solution to the malnutrition problem, right?
    damning activityBy: observer | 18-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Hi, I wonder where the CPM people led by prakash carrot, etc are. While they are vociferous about projects undertaken in India, they seem to be strangely silent about chinese damning activities...why???
    Arunachal By: Varind | 18-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward It appears China has some inherited allergic with India like Pakistan. Though India is a peace loving country and wants cordial relations with neighbour with a view to live and let live. However, both China and Pak are taking India's peaceful avertures as sign of weakness and this illusion will go soon if Indians only start boycotting Chinese goods. We can break the back of China's economy by swearing not to buy "Made in China" and as far Pak, it is paper tiger and already feeling the pinch of what it has created. Arunachal is a part and parcel of India and so is J
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.