Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Green-eyed angel

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The role Norman Borlaug, who died on Saturday, played in the import of the dwarf “miracle wheat” seeds in the mid-’60s has almost a Puranic Katha status: with Sivaraman Saheb — the agriculture secretary — playing the Arjuna, C. Subramaniam — the minister — the Krishna, and Borlaug the role of the Pitamah.

    I landed in Delhi in 1974 after having modelled Gujarat’s perspectives, and given my econometrics degree was pulled in to head the then-powerful Perspective Planning Division of the Planning Commission, which has always been a friend of agricultural scientists. Borlaug would visit India. Great scientists at a particular level, like economists, live in the world of the laws of biology, botany and geology. Borlaug could easily slide into that world; but at another level, unlike economists, they don’t believe only in solving problems in theory. Borlaug was one such icon, like Verghese Kurien. He would come to the Planning Commission; and one could take one look at the way the director-general of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research and his men would tiptoe in with him and know he was the works. They would come to Sivaraman’s office and I would be asked to hang around because he had a disconcerting habit of asking questions about canals, pump-sets, fertilisers and wheat prices — precisely the questions the ICAR abhorred. These were the things they could blame the economists for, and so I had to chip in. Jeff Sachs, who has spent a lot of his time rubbishing Indian efforts, now prescribes for Sahelian — sub-Saharan — Africa the Indian ‘70s model of giving money for tubewells and a good price. For Borlaug the world was more complicated. Owning the Indian wheat revolution, he was not going to let that rot in the fields.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    The green-eyed angelBy: Deepak K. Mehta | 15-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Some times, as a sociaty, we do not recognize greatness when we see it. Dr. Borlaug should have got the BharatRatna. I believe he is the greatest person not to have received it. This will remain one of our grave errors of judgment or failure of courage, whatever itr is.
    Media coverageBy: Arun | 15-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward It is unfortunate that media has not covered the passing of Mr Borlaug. If only we can get over our petty politics
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.