Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

HC admits petitions against Muslim quota

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Personal Loan

    A division bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice G S Singhvi and Justice B Prakash Rao, on Tuesday, admitted a batch of writ petitions challenging the 4 per cent reservations for Muslims in state government jobs and educational institutions and posted the matter for hearing before a larger bench.

    The writ petitions were earlier adjourned on technical grounds.

    However, the Bench did not grant a stay on the ongoing admissions to engineering, medical and other courses in various universities, saying it had not yet heard the respondents. The Bench said the admissions will be subject to the outcome of writ petitions and that the state Government had to inform all the students about the same before admitting them to various courses.

    The court granted two weeks, instead of the demanded four weeks, to the Advocate-General for filing the counter. The counsel appearing before the Bench pointed to the problems in granting reservations to the entire Muslim community.

    Ads by Google

    According to the petitioners, a report prepared by a committee in 1972 said that only a few sections of the Muslim community and not the community as a whole were backward.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.