Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

HC awards full gratuity to govt employee

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Disposing of a 27-year-old case, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has decided in favour of a man who had been fighting to be awarded his gratuity. Justice K Kannan of the High Court recently dismissed an appeal filed by District Food and Supplies Controller, Ropar, who had challenged an order passed by the Labour Court, which had set aside an order of termination passed by the Controller against its employee, Prem Chand.

    A resident of Ropar, Prem Chand was inducted as a watchman with the government on daily wages on December 7, 1979 and worked till February 26, 1983.

    His services were terminated on February 26, 1983, but the order of termination was later set aside by the Labour Court, which also directed the authorities to reinstate him, but without arrears.

    He was reinstated on August 11, 1983, put on regular payscale and served till he was superannuated on December 31, 1998.

    Ads by Google

    The Labour Court also directed that Prem Chand should be paid gratuity as if there was no discontinuity in his service.

    District Food and Supplies Controller, Ropar, however, challenged the order before the High Court.

    Counsel for the Controller submitted that for calculating gratuity only the actual service can be considered in case of a daily wage worker.

    Dismissing the appeal filed by the Controller and upholding the decision of the Labour Court, Justice K Kannan said, “The provision for continuity of service in the award of the Labour Court could only be seen in the context of every other benefit which the workman would have been entitled to, other than the back wages, which, by express order, the Labour Court was disallowing in this particular case.”

    Justice Kannan observed: “The continuity in the sense employed by the Labour Court ought, in my view, to be applied also to the entitlement of gratuity. The petition is therefore dismissed.”

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.