HC grants bail to Nooriya Haveliwala
Related
Top Stories
- IPL spot-fixing case: Net widens, police watching 3 more players, other bookies
- IPL 2013: Imperious Brad Hodge powers Rajasthan Royals to qualifier
- Sonia Gandhi, PM Manmohan Singh slam BJP for disrupting Parliament, stalling bills
- IPL spot-fixing: 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief's son-in-law, say cops
- Jessica Lall case: Shayan Munshi to face perjury trial

The Bombay High Court Friday granted bail to Nooriya Haveliwala, the NRI sentenced last November to five-year rigorous imprisonment for rash and negligent driving leading to death of two persons including a traffic policeman in January 2010.
In an operative order, Justice R P Sondurbaldota granted bail pending hearing of her appeal against the conviction, and the appeal of the state government seeking enhancement of jail term to 10 years and challenging her being acquitted of Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act charges.
A copy of the full order would be made available to Haveliwala and the prosecution in a few days.
Along with several sections of the Indian Penal Code, the special NDPS court had found Haveliwala guilty under section 304 (II) (culpable homicide not amounting to murder).
The court had convicted her for rash and negligent driving but she had been acquitted of NDPS Act charges.
Nooriya, the only daughter of Yusuf Haveliwala, a psychiatrist working with the US Army, had on January 30, 2010, rammed her SUV into seven people, killing two persons including a traffic cop and injuring five others, including four other policemen.
The trial court had observed, "The accused (Nooriya) cannot deny her knowledge of the repercussions of such (drunken) driving that it may cause culpable homicide not amounting to murder."
Earlier, Justice A M Thipsay, who had partly heard her bail application, had questioned application of section 304 (II) of the Indian Penal Code in accident cases.
Section 304 (II) refers to culpable homicide not amounting to murder "if the act is done with the 'knowledge' that it is likely to cause death, but without any intention to cause death, or to cause such bodily injury as is likely to cause death." Justice Thipsay had then asked, "How do you attribute 'knowledge'?"
Editors’ Pick
- Paddy shortfall blamed for mystery death of procurement officer
- 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief’s son-in-law: cops
- Net widens, police watching three more players, new set of bookies
- Suspected Islamists behead soldier on London street
- Malegaon 2006 case: NIA names four right wing terror suspects
- BJP invokes 'sarcasm, ridicule' against PM
- Nine years on, Sonia, PM put up show of unity, Singh hints at unfinished business


Teen raped at birthday party, sold to man
Alleged bomb planter Siddiqui claims ATS threatened to kill him
Cops pin hopes on CCTV footage to arrest acid attack accused
BMC single window to help people check legality of flats




















