HC seeks state’s response on move to drop Varanasi blast cases
Related
Top Stories
- Former Ranji player held, Sreesanth and others to be produced in court today
- Li Keqiang pitches for more Chinese investments as he backs trade balance
- All eyes on Narendra Modi as BJP set to discuss strategy for Lok Sabha polls
- SC agrees to hear PIL to stay IPL matches due to spot-fixing
- Monstrous tornado rips through US city of Oklahoma, 90 dead
The Allahabad High Court on Thursday sought the response of the state government on a petition challenging its proposed move to withdraw cases against the accused in the Varanasi serial blasts of March 7, 2006.
The court has fixed November 27 as the next date of hearing.
The petition has been filed by Nityanand Chaubey, an advocate and social activist from Varanasi. He has already filed a petition challenging the state government's proposed move to withdraw cases against the accused in the Rampur CRPF camp attack case of 2007.
The petitioner's counsel, Shashi Shankar Tiwari, said the court intended to connect the two petitions since they had similar prayers and raised the same questions.
"But we requested the court to hear the two petitions separately as the incidents had occurred in different places at different times and the state government too had issued separate notifications seeking the report of the district administration concerned on the possibility of withdrawing the cases against the accused. The court has agreed with our prayer," said Tiwari.
The court, while hearing the other petition related to the CRPF camp attack case, gave the state government counsel one week more to seek instructions and fixed the matter for November 29.
The petition related to the Varanasi blasts has pointed out that three blasts - at Sankat Mochan temple, Dashashwamedha Ghat and Varanasi cantonment railway station - occurred on March 7, 2006. At least 21 people were killed and more than 100 injured. The police had arrested an alleged operative of the Harkat-ul-Jihad-e-Islami (HuJI) in this connection. The petitioner has prayed that the high court direct the state government to quash the notification issued on October 31, in which a report on the possibility of withdrawing cases against accused in the Varanasi blasts was sought.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


SHO suspended for using 'foul language' against Akhilesh, Mulayam
BJP leader accused of killing woman, on the run
In Rae Bareli, Priyanka Gandhi tells Congress workers to be 'visible among public'
'Shiv Sena' activists thrash 'couples' during protest against Valentine's Day



















