Hearing stories of rape victims, Verma panel members wept
Related
Top Stories
- Trouble mounts for Sreesanth as Mumbai cops gather more evidence
- SIT to seek Supreme Court guidance on Maya Kodnani death penalty issue
- Tamil Nadu police bans Yasin Malik-linked pro-Eelam public meeting
- Kings XI Punjab end IPL 2013 campaign with a win
- Narendra Modi: India losing sheen as agricultural nation

The J S Verma panel may have come in for fulsome praise for its speedy and comprehensive work to suggest changes to laws to help boost the safety of women after the Delhi gangrape, but there were moments during the process that were deeply saddening for the three-member committee.
In fact, the first-person stories of young girls and a boy traumatised by years of sexual exploitation were so gut-wrenching that Verma and his two colleagues broke down and wept.
Verma, former Himachal Pradesh high court chief justice Leila Seth and former solicitor-general of India Gopal Subramanium were so moved by the horrific tale of sexual and mental exploitation narrated by a young girl, one of the many who personally appeared before them, that they gave her about Rs 1.5 lakh.
"We gave the money so that she could try and rebuild her life. After hearing her story, all three of us wept... such was the feeling of helplessness that we had," Subramanium told The Indian Express. "Do you know that not only had she been sexually exploited repeatedly, she had also not been paid any wages by the people at whose home she was working? Where is our sense of justice? What about her rights?"
During the sittings, the committee interacted with many rape victims and children who were victims of trafficking and forced drug-abuse and their testimonies form part of the report submitted to the home ministry.
"We had to understand the trauma that rape victims undergo and that is why we interviewed some of them. After talking to them, I felt that the law in India had failed. I said sorry to them," he said.
Subramanium also disclosed that the three members came "very close" to recommending death as punishment for rapists. But all three decided against doing so, instead recommending 20 years imprisonment or life imprisonment until the "rest of that person's natural life".
... contd.
ALSO READ
Editors’ Pick
- Quake-hit and shaken, Bhaderwah spends nights in the open
- UP blast accused dies on way to jail, govt wanted to drop case against him
- Former civil aviation secy changes mind, seeks airport security exemption as EC
- BCCI suspects Gujarat players in other teams were also approached
- Police on money trail, Sreesanth in fresh trouble
- Chhattisgarh 'encounter' leaves 8 villagers dead, no Maoist link yet
- Li arrives today, PM to seek early revival of border talks


Attack in Jammu jail: India acted fast, but Pak took no action: Ghulam Nabi Azad
Geetika suicide case: Court reserves order on framing of charge
President Pranab Mukherjee asks Supreme Court to decide women lawyers' plea for safer courts
Pawan Kumar Bansal meets Congress top brass, presents his stance




















