Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Hiding behind Hyde

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Dhruva Jaishankar

    That leaves Section 106, which will ensure that the nuclear exemption for India will cease to be effective if “the president determines that India has detonated an explosive device.” India faced severe sanctions when it tested in 1998, and even in the absence of the deal, it will not likely go unpunished for testing, particularly if it did so unilaterally. But is this clause — or, for that matter, the entire combination of less-than-perfect passages in the Hyde Act — enough of a reason to postpone or reject the nuclear deal?

    The writer researches US foreign policy towards South Asia in Washington DC dhruva.jaishankar@gmail.com

    Previous1234
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.