Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Hindu group in US objects to 'The Story of India'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • A US-based Hindu advocacy group has taken strong objection to historian Michael Wood's documentary ‘The Story of India,’ being telecast on public television, describing its presentation of the Aryan Migration Theory (AMT) as ‘agenda driven.’

    Rejecting the theory, the Hindu American Foundation (HAF) said India has always been the cradle of Hindu civilization and there is no debate about it.

    "Michael Wood clearly admires India and its people, and this shows through in his passionate depiction of India," said Sheetal Shah, HAF's Director of Development and Outreach.

    "We are not seeking to discredit the 'Story of India' in its entirety, but viewers should be aware that a major error was made in the documentary that fails scrutiny and should be corrected," she said.

    The Hindu advocacy group said it has received a deluge of phone calls protesting the presentation of the ‘now discredited’ theory, currently being shown on television.

    Ads by Google

    The AMT theorises that in 1500 BCE pastoral tribes that came to be known as Aryans, migrated from Central Europe to Northwest India eventually dispersing indigenous people and imposing their own culture.

    "This theory, that is not supported by archaeological evidence, was first posited by European Indologists and British colonialists, eventually finding support from a section of India's politically motivated linguists and historians such as Romila Thapar, and famously, controversial Harvard linguist, Michael Witzel," she said.

    This theory, the HAF believes, is ‘agenda-driven’.

    In his documentary, HAF says, Wood holds that the early Hindu practice of worshipping devas, or demigods representing elements, ‘somehow implies that these practices were imported from Central Asia.’

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Aryan Invasion is supported by historical evidenceBy: chandran | 05-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The availability of overwhelming evidences confirm that Aryan invation/migration did take place. The invading Aryans destroyed the culturally advanced Indus Valley Civilisation (IVC) and established a pastoral and semi-nomadic set up over the same. The total absence of cow - which is central to the aryan life - in IVC is only due to this reason. The IVC people lived in well built cities which are architectural marvels, even as per today's standards. But in the Rg Veda there is no mention of any cities built by Aryanss.The religious beliefs etc of Aryans were also totally different from the IVC. The IVC people did not worship Rg Vedic gods like Agni, Indra, Varuna etc. The skeletal remains of IVC people consist mostly of non-Aryan people. All this proves beyond doubt that Aryan invasion did take place at some point of time. Even the "Return of Aryans" theory is built on the premise that the sudden entry of Aryans in to India cannot now be disputed.
    aryanBy: n.radhakrishnan | 08-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward If at all Wood had touched upon Aryan invasion/migration as the first intrusion of aryan people,it is to be appreciated.Hindu religion is being aryanised and made a plank for Hindi apeaking noretheners to subjugate all-non-aryan dravidians,kolarians,muslims christians etc.
    AIT/AMT is a jokeBy: RS | 15-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Aryan invasion theory now in its avatar of "migration" theory is a linguist's wet dream and is discounted by serious historians except for the commie ones in India. The best way to clear the whole controversy is by genetic mapping, R1A1 is supposed to be the "Aryan" gene, this particular gene is found in great diversity within Indian subcontinent and peters off when you head towards central asia and middle east. A geneticist would tell that the data would point to India
    AMT is CorrectBy: Sandip | 25-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward I still believe in the Aryan Invasion/Migration theory. I would rather side with historians from well respected universities than some Hindu fundamentalist chauvanist scholars. What the Aryans practiced is not the Hinduism of today. Aryans were against idol worship and ate beef. Plus the name Hindu was coined by the Muslim invaders.
    Aryans orinally from IndiaBy: Lachman Balani | 18-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward In the book "Return of the Aryans"- the theory is that the people from the Indus valley were the original Aryans and that they migrated to Europe and returned to India. Even names in the Teutonic pantheon of Gods smack of Indian names.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.