Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Hindu rate of BJP growth

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Vajpayee, the BJP leader most respected by the minorities, tried, but lost his nerve at the most decisive moment, a moment that, if seized, would have placed him among India’s great statesmen for ever, in fact our first real statesman of the Right, or may be the second, if you place Sardar Patel somewhere there. This moment was the killings of Gujarat in 2002 — on the flight to Goa, for the party national executive meeting, when he had to decide on sacking Modi after his “Raj-dharma” speech. But he blinked. In the process, he diminished himself, and his party, and gave its opponents Modi as their second rallying point after Ayodhya.

    That Advani tried to address the same ideological isolation subsequently, with his statement on Jinnah, underlines the fact that, deep down, political wisdom does exist while the will and conviction are lacking. He has tried to re-position his party closer to the centre in a slightly more complex, but fascinating manner. The alliance with the Akalis in Punjab and with Mayawati in Uttar Pradesh, he thought, had helped move his party to the centre; and while the Muslims may still not vote for it, if he could simply persuade them not to treat the BJP as their permanent enemy — that needed to be defeated by voting tactically against it all over the country — he could change its politics fundamentally. But neither had he prepared his party and its ideological mentors, nor had he the audacity and conviction to bash on regardless. So this break-out from the trenches remained short, half-hearted and a failure. Yet again, Advani and his BJP blew an opportunity presented by Varun Gandhi’s speeches. Imagine if, instead of rushing to his defence and demanding a forensic examination of the DVDs, Advani stated unequivocally that he abhorred such language and politics and dropped Varun as his candidate? In one stroke, it would have brought his party closer to the centre, given it wider acceptability, and enhanced his stature in a manner that no website or ad-campaign, howsoever brilliant, could ever have done.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    After varunBy: Tushar | 13-May-2009 Reply | Forward What if Mr Advani would have thrown out varun from the party. These psuedo-seculars would have then demanded Narendra Modi's head, even if he was thrown out then they would have demanded Advani's head. The problem with the likes of Shekhar Gupta is that he doesn't ask the congress why Antulay was not sacked for his comments regarding karkare's killing. Why Arjun Sign is not sacked for allowing Jamia Univ to fight for accussed in several bombings. Shekhar Gupta doesn't say that UPA govt followed VOTE BANK Politic'ss with total disregard to the security of the country. In my opinion BJP need not change. What Mr Shekhar Gupta should do is educate Muslims to stop behaving like spoilt childs , (a perenially harmed community). They have equal opportunities, which no minority gets in an Islamic Country. Convice them to go join the mainstream.
    BJPBy: Shekhar | 13-May-2009 Reply | Forward Shekhar - Trust you will spend time to review the comments on your writeup. In last 4 general elections, BJP has been the largest party 3 times by more than 10% margin and second largest once that too by a small margin of 5%. If you have any understanding of statistical analysis of data, it is the only party at national level which has grown.People like you from JNU school of thought, does not like anyone who speak for the majority and have coined the Secularism meaning appeasement of minorities and bashing of majority. Please spend some time in truly secular countries like US, UK and understand the true meaning of secular government. Parties like Congress will forever keep India backward. It was our good luck that we have Narsimha Rao and Atal Bihari as PM for 10 years, that saw us marching ahead and matching up with global best.Long Live the BJP.
    Majority vs MinorityBy: Bharavi | 12-May-2009 Reply | Forward Secularism is just one aspect of Democracy and its not really mandeted by Democracy. Its a natural product of a mutual agreement between Majority and minority (in religious sense). This dialog between majority and minority is the main characteristics of true democracy. Majority and minority takes different forms in different circumstances (e.g. Marathi and non-Marathi in Maharashtra, blacks and whites in USA) but the broad responsibilities of both groups remain same. To be a true national party, BJP (and Congress) needs to understand that. However, as Shekhar says, our politics is frozen in one dimension. At least one party needs to come out of the trench and the one that does, will be the obvious winner. Both the parties need to understand that majority has many dimensions. How else can you answer these questions - why, inspite of being the party of Hindus, BJP can't get even 50% of Hindu votes and why can't Congress get Muslim votes in spite of being so-called secular party?
    BJP - mistake to leave the path of righteousness - Hindutva is the only way forwardBy: Girish Podar | 12-May-2009 Reply | Forward Get a bunch of loyal Hindus to start some news channels - to nail the likes Shekhar's friends - Pronoy Roy and his tribe of Communals, just as Al Jazeera did to nail the lies of CNN and BBC et al. I am sure BJP backers can manage a few crores to start off the channels. Most of the English channels are paid to pamper and speak good about the worst offenders and looters of this nation - the Congress party and its leaders, so the Congress does not need to start its own channel. If Maran and DMK and even Jaya can have a channel of their own, why not the BJP?
    Why only Hindus?By: Ajay | 11-May-2009 Reply | Forward Why are only Hindus expected to carry the burden of secularism? Why shouldn't BJP talk of welfare of the majority?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.