Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Hoping for mile from Pak, India gives more than an inch

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Yousuf Raza Gilani and Manmohan Singh
    Manmohan Singh and Yousuf Raza Gilani during a bilateral meet in Egypt.
    Personal Loan

    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and his Pakistan counterpart Yousuf Raza Gilani today stopped short of resuming the stalled Composite Dialogue process with New Delhi opting to wait for a couple of months to watch how Islamabad translates its assurances on the 26/11 investigations into concrete action.

    This became clear only after enough confusion had been created by one line in the joint statement issued hours after the two leaders met: “Action on terrorism should not be linked to the composite dialogue process and these should not be bracketed”.

    This was seen as India agreeing to resume the dialogue process. Later, when the PM was asked about this, his reply was categorical, “That is not my interpretation.”

    And then he explained: “The Pakistani side was very keen we agree here and now to resume the composite dialogue. But unless we are satisfied about the action taken against the people responsible for the Mumbai attacks no dialogue can succeed.”

    Ads by Google

    Dismissing the view that India had effectively opened the doors for the dialogue to start without any concrete result on the terror front, he said: “We were quite clear that if acts of terrorism continue to be perpetrated, there is no question of a dialogue, least of all, a comprehensive dialogue. If there is no attempt to contain terrorism, no dialogue can make progress. A dialogue process even if it starts, cannot move forward.”

    The first test will come up on Saturday when the case against Lashkar-e-Toiba operations head and prime accused Zaki-ur-Rehman Lakhvi comes up for hearing. The expectation is that he, along with five others, will be indicted and a chargesheet submitted. But India continues to be watchful as the case has been adjourned thrice because a new judge has not been appointed to the court concerned.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Law By: murali | 18-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward We have no speedy time bound judgement with capital punishment against terrorist, if we have these nobody will help or enter the terrorist group for distrubing the nation. On arrest/dialogues the terrorist cannot be wiped out.
    Befitting replyBy: Rachhpal Atwal | 18-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward It is better to get the ball rolling first and later bring the rest of the issue on the venue. One has to break the ice rather than sitting tight lipped. This is called good diplomacy. This new government in Islamabad has just came out of the bush and India has to teach them how to walk the rope. Unless they have their own masters!
    Wrong title!By: Chris Danchek | 18-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward The title should have been:Hoping for an inch from Pak, India gives more than an mile.Since when has a country buckled so deeply when another country openly confesses to killing the former's citizens? Remember 9/11 and America's response?
    LogicalBy: ctg | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Why cry your guts out? 26/11 saw human chains then candle vigils then blah...blah TV debates; then saw our sr. minister talking tough (just talking talking and yet talking); then WE elected the same group back to the seat of power. My dears pay your taxes, go quietly on your daily routines; treat terrorism actions as daily routines and corruption as necessary appandages of life. Do not get upset and angry because we have elected (or abstained) our government. Think objectively and sensibly (me too) when elections are visible on the horison---relax (cry privately if we may)
    please HillaryBy: rjmajithia | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward what can you expect from twice operated PM with an aged Foreign Minister and senile National Security Adviser assited by a trio of Kerala officials. Let us forrget 26/11 and instead defend our presence in Afghanistan on alleged Balochistan interference.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.