Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Hours after she took Kasab case, Sena attack forces lawyer to withdraw

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Hours after she said she was “confident” and had “taken the right decision” by agreeing to defend Ajmal Amir Kasab, the lone terrorist captured alive during the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks, Anjali Waghmare, a government legal aid panel lawyer and the wife of a city policeman, said she would withdraw from the case following a violent protest outside her house late tonight.

    Waghmare’s turnaround came after hundreds of protesters, mostly Shiv Sainiks, gathered outside the police housing complex in Worli and shouted slogans against her for agreeing to take the case. Some even threw stones at her building but the mob could not reach her house inside the compound. “No one is hurt but I have decided to withdraw,” Waghmare told The Indian Express on the phone.

    If the special court appointed to try Kasab allows her to withdraw, she would be the second to do so. In December, a local lawyer, Dinesh Mota, had been selected to represent Kasab but he withdrew at the last minute citing personal ethics and said he was even willing to risk his licence than defend Kasab.

    Ads by Google

    Earlier in the day, Special Judge M L Tahilyani had picked 40-year-old Waghmare, the mother of a child, from among seven lawyers who had been shortlisted from the 17-member state legal aid panel. The court had also said that the trial would now start on April 6 at a special court being set up inside the Arthur Road jail.

    A law graduate from Pune’s Symbiosis University, Waghmare began her career in 1996 and has been on the state legal aid panel for 12 years, conducting murder trials. After her appointment, she had said: “I am confident of myself and, being an Indian citizen, have taken the right decision by accepting the case as, legally, Kasab cannot be tried without legal representation.” She has appeared in several important cases such as the fake stamp paper case and in a few hearings for 1993 blasts accused Karimulla, a close aide of extradited gangster Abu Salem.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    HANG HIMBy: LALITH BHANSAL | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward FIRST LET THEM PROBE THE INTELLIGENCE FAILURE OF THE STATE AND CENTRAL GOVERNMENT ON THE MUMBAI ATTACK BOTH BEING RULED BY CONGRESS. ANY LAWYER WHO WANTS TO APPEAR FOR KASAB WILL HAVE THE SAME FATE WHAT IS THERE TO ARGUE IF ALL DETAILS AND EVIDENCE HAS BEEN COLLECTED FROM HIM PUBLICLY HANG HIM THAT WILL BE A LESSON TO OTHERS.
    Get over your emotionsBy: Paul | 01-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward This is a democracy you moron!!!!.Even criminal has a right to have attorney. Go check other western countries. Even gitmo prisoners are getting civil lawyers in america. Get over your emotions. Who told you that democracy is easy to handle. What is the difference between you and the taliban who publicaly shot or cut criminals throat.
    connetionsBy: Jinder | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward If Kasab had connections with the Thackeray family like Sunjay Dutt, he might have gotten away
    People's judgementBy: Naveed | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Why we are treating this terrorist as a VIP? with all sort of security, media attention, allowing lawyers to defend? Ask the victims dear ones (both hindus and muslims) they will give the judgement.
    Terrorist is getting the treatment for the sake of Justice in IndiaBy: Giri | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward HiKasab is the lone surviving terrorist and we want to render Justice that he denied his victims. He is getting the treatment because he is in the judicial process. I believe it is high time the case is transferred away from Mumbai. There is no chance of justice to Kasab in Mumbai. I too feel that he has to get the maximum punishment, may be death penalty. But it has to be after the complete judicial process. We owe this not to Kasab but to the entire world.
    Kasab'd defenseBy: Naim Naqvi | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Irrespective of the final decision Mrs. Waghmare takes about her pursuing the case of Kasab it clear to everyone that she was going to defend the indefensible. There is nothing much to argue and the trial is merely a formality. She has not taken up Kasab case like Ram Jetjmalani's usual adventures. She was going to take up the case at the behest of Maharashtra government. Fanaticism is not based on reason and these organizations are devoid of reason. They are pretending to be ignorant of national and international laws. They don't want to miss any chance to come into lime-light even for all the silly reasons. Little wonder Advani Ji wants a debate with the P.M ! Indian Judiciary can't carry forward the case of Kasab to it's logical end without providing him a lawyer. The delay is legal assistance to Kasab will help in procrustination of the hearing process. It is a paradox that on one side they want to hang one criminal a.s.a.p. and on the other side they want to delay the trial.
    not at the behest of Mah govtBy: Dilshad | 01-Apr-2009 Reply | Forward I think she is a court appointed lawyer. Unless Mah govt is dictating to the courts - the lady had the case thrust on her.And she balked.
    Kasab defenceBy: Uday Sharma | 31-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward And I had my 15 minutes of fame.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.