How can Rathore be top cop with molestation charges against him, asks Punjab HC
Top Stories
- IPL spot-fixing case: Delhi Police to trace money trail in four cities
- PM-level talks: India to convey concerns over Ladakh incursion to Chinese Premier
- IPL 2013 LIVE SCORE: Kings XI Punjab vs Mumbai Indians
- Rajapaksa slams Tamil diaspora for lack of support in reconciliation process
- Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah inducts 28 ministers, keeps tainted away
The Punjab and Haryana High Court today questioned how SPS Rathore was promoted to the top rank of the director general of police despite the Ruchika Girhotra molestation case pending against him.
A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Mukul Mudgal and Ranjan Gogoi while seeking details from the Haryana government in this regard fixed January 28 as the next date of hearing.
Meanwhile, the CBI submitted it will also place on record its final report in the FIRs in three fresh cases filed against the disgraced former top cop on January 28.
The court direction came during hearing of a PIL filed by a local advocate seeking a fresh case against Rathore for abetment to suicide of Ruchika, a 14-year-old budding tennis player, in 1993.
After spending close to six months behind bars, 68-year-old Rathore, who was sentenced to 18-months in jail in the Ruchika molestation case, was released from prison after the Supreme Court granted him bail on November 11.
Ruchika was molested on August 12,1990.
On the promotion issue, the Bench observed how Rathore was promoted despite a criminal case pending against him.
The court also directed the Haryana government to place on record in form of an affidavit its promotion policy with regard to officers facing criminal charges.
The government told the court it would file its details on promotion policy on the next date of hearing, especially in connection with Rathore.
The CBI had recently filed two closure reports in the Special CBI Court in Ambala in two of the three fresh cases registered against the former Haryana DGP.
The first two cases against Rathore are related to doctoring of Ruchika's postmortem report and custodial torture of her brother Ashu. Probe is still on in the case on the abetment to suicide charge against him.
The lawyer had filed the PIL in December last year seeking a fresh case against Rathore under section 305 of the IPC (abetment of suicide of a minor or insane person) as Ruchika was a minor when the incident occurred. A person convicted under section 305 IPC could face death penalty or life imprisonment.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Destitute, orphan students outclass rest in Andhra Class 10 exams
- To re-energise ties, PM wants to visit US, waits for confirmation
- NIA court says no terror link, frees 'Hizbul militant' Liyaqat on bail
- CBI arrests its coal allotments investigator on bribery charge
- ‘Cricketer-bookie Amit may have used Jiju to reach Sree’
- BCCI chief N Srinivasan says police must prove spot-fixing allegations
- As it all sinks in, Sreesanth breaks down in tears, 'accepts mistake'


Virender Sehwag's traffic awareness programme turns into flop show
Karnataka polls: Mixed bag of luck for family politics
For Karnataka polls, P Chidambaram turns 'TV reporter'
Sonia Gandhi hails Karnataka showing, PM says BJP ideology rejected




















