Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

How Supreme Court traced the case

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • The Supreme Court took cognizance of a news report in The Indian Express edition dated August 2, 2002 alleging political patronage in allotment of retail outlets of petroleum products, LPG distributorship and SKO-LDO dealership. Further reports between August 2 and August 5, 2002 brought to light how dealers/distributors were appointed on the basis of political patronage/linkage, sidelining the norms.

    Consequent criticism by the Press and even Parliament led to cases being reviewed on August 5, 2002 by the then Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee, who directed the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas to cancel all allotments made with effect from January, 2000.

    A formal order, cancelling all allotments, was issued on August 9, 2002 by the Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas.

    However, the order was challenged by allottee in several High Courts. Transfer petitions were filed in the apex court, which on December 20, 2002, in case titled Onkar Lal Bajaj, disposed of all the petitions by setting aside the Government’s order of August 9. The SC appointed a committee comprising Justice S.C. Agrawal, a retired SC Judge and Justice P.K. Bahri, a retired Judge of the High Court of Delhi, to examine 413 cases of allotment. The Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas and the four oil companies were directed to render full, complete and meaningful assistance to the committee and place all the relevant records before the committee within five days.

    Ads by Google

    The Ministry was also directed to appoint a nodal officer not below the rank of a Joint Secretary for effective working of the committee. The order also said that if the Committee, on preliminary examination of any case, thinks that the allotment was made on merits and not as a result of political connections or other extraneous considerations, it would be open to the committee not to proceed with probe in detail.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.