You are here: IE »   Story

Karan Johar’s apology a publicity stunt: Ashok Chavan

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Wake up sid
    When there’s an election round the corner, any random thing can become political dyamite.
    Discount UK Shopping

    When there’s an election round the corner, any random thing can become political dyamite. And when there’s an election round the corner in Maharashtra, there seems to be no end to the absurdity. Where else would a sweet and inoffensive slacker comedy like Wake up, Sid find itself as the flashpoint for fervid identity politics?

    Raj Thackeray’s MNS threatened theatres from screening the movie, because it commits the cardinal sin of referring to the city as Bombay a few times (though it says Mumbai just as casually, and the lead characters work at a magazine called Mumbai Beat). Bollywood understands the language of violence, said Thackeray in silky Marathi doubtless — and sure enough, Karan Johar, one of the most powerful names in the industry, promptly proved him right. He went over to Thackeray’s place to apologise, and promised to insert a grovelling disclaimer before the movie. Chief Minister Ashok Chavan expressed his disgust with both the bully and the cowed victim, saying that the state was perfectly capable of providing security to Karan Johar, and that this apology was just a publicity stunt. But more charitably, maybe Johar had no desire to be the brave voice of dissent, and he figured a quick apology was better that inviting Thackeray’s inconvenient enmity. But if Karan Johar couldn’t stand up to a self-styled thug like Thackeray, what can less influential folks do but stay away from anything likely to attract his glowering attentions?

    Ads by Google

    The point is not that Raj Thackeray (and Bal Thackeray before him) have seized upon Marathi manoos disenfranchisement to define a coarse and resentful politics — the point is that they get away with it. The city in Wake up, Sid is definitely not the hick town of Raj Thackeray’s dreams — it is indeed “Bombay”, the fabled gritty city where young people come from Kolkata and Bangalore, seeking their own private grails. Why isn’t our politics aggressively sticking up for that expansive vision? We know the uses of taking an extreme position: you help decide or determine where the centre will fall. By not countering the narratives, we — and indeed, quite glaringly, Chavan’s own administration — are letting goons forever blight the idea of Bombay.

    BombayBy: richard | 06-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward The day Bombay become fully Mumbai, the competitive spirit which has made this city unique in India, will disappear. Whatever any raj can do, this city will remain Bombay in our heart. Remember Hitler and his Aryan supremacy? The Jews survived. So also will be the Lovers of Bombay.
    BAGDI PREMBy: DSRam | 06-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Raj Thakres kids studing in BOMBAY SCOTTISH, in english Medium, proves how much he loves Marathi. He never asked the school to change the name to MUMBAI SCOTTISH. But he will be successful in wooing Marathi manoos again. Its not his fault. ITS THE FAULT OF MARATHI MANOOS WHO CAN BE EASILY FOOLED.
    Did the female character in the movie refer to Kolkatta as Calcutta or KolkattaBy: Milind | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward I believe that the Konkana Sen's character did not refer to Kolkatta as Calcutta, so how come Ranbir Kapur's character refer Mumbai as Mumbai instead of Mumbai or call Kolkata instead of Calcutta in the movie; Correct me if I am wrong
    Karan Johar's problem is weak Govt.By: Maitrey Mehta | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Raj Thakrey makes big fuss for britisher's given name like "Bombay" or for naming store as "Karanchi" sweets etc.Britishers ruled India for 200 years because we were divided.Now what is Raj doing? He is also dividing country on name of "Marathi"
    Karan Johar’s apology a publicity stunt:By: N.V.SANKARAN | 05-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward I do not support the action by Raj Thackeray and his supporters. But, I feel that Karan Johar has conducted himself in an exemplary manner. He had the courage and decency to apologize to anybody whose feelings are hurt by his actions, even if it is a very small section of the people and did not hide behind the fundamental right of "Artistic Freedom". Had M.F. Hussain shown this decency, apologized for hurting the feelings of the Hindus by his obscene, vulgar and nude paintings of Hindu Gods and Goddesses and withdrew those offensive paintings instead of hiding behind his "artistic freedom", probably, he would not have had to remain in exile.
    Publicity StuntBy: Mayur Prabhu | 06-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Dear Friend,Whats the point in hurtung's someones sentiments and then saying sorry. Tommorow even Osama may come out and say Sorry. Is this justifiable?
    Saying "sorry"By: N.V.SANKARAN | 06-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward I agree with you that, ideally one should not do anything that may hurt others feelings. But, we are all human beings and may unwittingly commit small mistakes which may hurt the feelings of others. Under such circumstances, the next best thing to do is to apologize and take corrective action. Osama's crimes however cannot be undone and therefore unpardonable.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.