Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

‘I condemn the beheading... but we have to see it in the background of state violence’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Chhattisgarh-based doctor BINAYAK SEN was arrested in May 2007 for his alleged links with Naxalites. Following a public campaign for his release, he was granted bail by the Supreme Court in May 2009. In this interview with VINAY SITAPATI, he speaks on the beheading of an abducted police inspector by Naxalites.

    Inspector Francis Induwar was kidnapped and beheaded by Naxalites in Jharkhand recently. Whatever your ideology, is this not cold-blooded murder?

    I condemn the beheading. It is absolutely unacceptable. There is no way I can approve of the killing. There are some questions about who has carried it out. If the CPI (Maoist) has carried it out, I condemn their action. Having said this, it is important to remember that the violence of resistance is a consequence, not a cause. We have to see it in the background of state violence.

    Ads by Google

    But Induwar was in a market when he was captured and then later murdered. How can this be consequential violence?

    I have already said that I condemn this action. It is murder and has no justification. But the general violence is a consequence of the state violence — both structural and direct. The vast majority of the poor people are kept in poverty because of the state. Today, the state violence and the violence of resistance are locked into a tragic cycle. This cycle needs to be broken. Both forms of violence need to be brought to a halt. We need to halt military engagement and start talking.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Lenin termed them "useful idiots"By: Shovon Chakraborty | 21-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Lenin had used the term "useful idiots" to describe the romantic liberals whose hearts were bleeding for the communists, although the latter had only one agenda. The agenda of a violent uprising against the so called corrupt
    NoneBy: Fil Munas | 11-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Dr. Sen indeed speaks the truth. The ruling elites and the ones who control power and privilege in India do not want to listen and will ultimately end up harming themselves and their posterity.
    We need more people like Dr SenBy: Jatin | 11-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Nice article. We need more people like Dr Sen and we need them in active politics. We were hearing “India shining”, “incredible India” for far too long by either govt or influential Indian corporate houses and media who directly benefitted by this so-called development. Ground level facts by many UN and other neutral reports indicate that India is going downhill in almost every front (poverty, social injustice, education, research, transparency, governance etc). No army or police actions can root out extremist violence from Indian soil unless we implement law and order without any biasness and take care of common people.
    No one believes in constitutionBy: Raj Bhadra Singh | 09-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward What does this gentleman imply? One that people in Naxal hit areas are poor and two that it is the state and "elites" which are responsible for depriving these people from getting their due. Has anyone questioned him on second premise? People less sympathetic think extending government programs preferentially in these regions would help. No, radicals like these are talking about land rights to the landless. Indian state has a history of succumbing to such pressures and instituting land ceilings and reforms to distribute land. Naxal supporters are no gullible, innocent people, they understand the basic weakness of state and believe one day they will get land the way others got in heady socialist days post independence. India has never insisted that right to property is fundamental that will be protected and there lies the ambiguity in our response. No politician and no one in media speaks for the rights of people owning land in the area. It is time we say we are no longer socialist.
    Justification for Naxalite violenceBy: Dr S Shankar Singh | 09-Oct-2009 Reply | Forward Binayak Sen's sympathy towards Naxalites shows from the interview. Mr Sen tries to justify Naxalite crimes in the background of state violence. It seems Naxalites, those believing in the ' power of gun ' have entered institutions like PUCL etc in the garb of intellectuals. They provide camouflage / cover for criminal activities of Naxalites.To call state action control action as state violence is most atrocious. Whatever state does, there is always legal scrutiny behind. There is accountability. The state and law enforcing authority is held accountable. Naxaliites are answerable to whom. Which law they follow. Do they follow Mao's law. Simple and straight fact is that Naxalie have no faith in masses. They can never win confidence of masses.So, they take recourse to criminal actvity supported by gangs and gun. They want to capture power by terrorising people with the help of gun. They have no popular support. They are trying to foist Maoism in the land of Gandhi.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.