Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

‘I was always Leftist. Economic reforms made me completely Marxist’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Mani Shankar Aiyar

    I have always wondered why this rate of growth and economic reforms process is dated to Manmohan Singh. Because actually it should be dated to L.K. Jha’s book Economic Strategy for the 80s. It is the decade in which we quickly recovered from agricultural depression and registered a double digit growth. At the beginning of the decade our biggest import was crude oil and after that it was edible oil. By the end of the decade we were exporters of several kinds of edible oil.

    Why is it that Nehru became successful with his Hindu rate of growth? The reason is that the Hindu rate of growth was five times what our pre-Hindu rate of growth was. From 1914 to 1947, the figures of which are available, the rate of growth of the Indian economy was 0.72 per cent. And we got the Hindu rate of growth which was five times that and it made a difference to the people. The minute you had solid land reforms, the people had their ‘zameen’. That is what Mother India was all about. People felt that they were involved in the process. All the political talk was: gareeb ke liye ham kya kar sakte hain. Indira Gandhi matched it beautifully when the entire political spectrum joined hands against her by saying, “Woh kehte hain Indira hatao, hum kehte hain Garibi hatao.”

    Ads by Google

    There is nobody so marginal in a government as the minister of Panchayati Raj. I count for nothing. Nothing! When I was the minister of petroleum, I used to walk surrounded by this media. I kept on telling them that petrol prices can do only three things — go up, go down or remain where they are. And it was all over the place. But try and get them to write two words about the 700 million Indians — absolutely impossible. And now with terrestrial television it is even worse. You have to be quarreling with your mother-in-law or hitting your daughter-in-law to be able to hit the headlines. It is impossible to get particularly the pink papers to focus on issues that affect the bulk of the people. And it is so easy to get them to focus on issues that are of high relevance to only one or two per cent of the people.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext3456
    Leave Mr. Mani Shanker Aiyer alone. focuss on attacking Karat.By: Sympathiser | 04-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Leave Mr. Mani Shanker Aiyer alone. focuss on attacking Karat.Let us Beg to Dr. Manmohan Sing to remove the word "Socialist" from our constitution with the aproval of Madom, whose mother in law installed that word in constitution to get some perks from Soviet Union. Once that word is gone, all cong men will forget all old stupid populist slogtans like "garibi Hatao..swedeeshi etc"BJP could have done that when they were in power. I have an idea, what about Dr. Manmohan Sing joining BJP. then he dont have to suffer burdens like Mr. Mani shanker Aiyyer. Let us campaign for that.
    Marxist AiyerBy: J.M.Manchanda | 28-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward This reads like an outburst from a disgruntled minister. Every one knows that Mani Shanker Aiyer i a brilliant and articulate man. But that's not a qualification for an important portfolio.As Minister of Panchayti Raj, he feels marginalised. It was reported that he complained to Sonia Gandhi that he knew nothing about Panchayati Raj. She is believed to have retorted that he knew nothing about petroleum too. The point is you are given a job and you have to excel at it or quit. He was laways a Leftist . So are most people in their teens when they dream of an equal world. But on growing up, they realize that it does not even exist in the CPM's poliburo. The economic reforms made him a Marxist. He should admit that it is his dislike for PM, who didn'tt allot him his favorite portfolio that makes him question why credit for economic reforms should be given to Manmohan Singh. Marxism only created utopian states, which either collapsed or embraced capitalism.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.