Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

IAF chief objects to Pay panel

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Adding another note to the controversy over the pay commission for the armed forces, Air Chief Marshal FH Major has shot off a letter protesting an ‘anomaly’ that puts officers of the rank of Lt Col in a pay band that is lower than their civilian counterparts.

    The letter, which is bound to create controversy as it comes after the pay scales were finalised by the Cabinet on August 14, was sent to Admiral Sureesh Mehta, the Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee on Monday. The letter requested Admiral Mehta to take up the issue with the Defence Minister.

    The main contention is that after the revised scales are implemented, officers of the rank of Lt Col in all three services would be put in a lower salary slab than civilians and Para Military officers of equivalent rank.

    “The finance ministry, working on the implementation of the sixth pay commission proposals, is introducing yet another anomaly by lowering the extant of parities of officers of the armed forces, of the Lt. Col. (and equivalent) by retaining them in pay band-3, while raising similarly placed civilian and paramilitary officers to pay band-4,” the letter says.

    Ads by Google

    Major has said that the new scales being planned by the finance minister would end up disturbing the parity between armed forces and para military forces by putting the three services at a lower level. “Civilian officers who were in a lower pay bracket and were hitherto drawing lesser pay as compared to Lt Col and equivalent of the armed forces, would now draw a higher basic salary in the running pay band,” the letter says.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    WHAT U R NOW SO ONCE I WASBy: Y Bisaria | 11-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward MR-1482, LT COL Y BISARIA, DO COMM. 17/1/1962, DO Ret.06 OCT 1982. Antedate attracted us to service but not counted for wheitage for pension. Practising stopped and paltry sum given but not counted for pension calculation. No npa was given with pension initially, grante at a later date to be withdrawn later. Let us not accept this ir-rational Tt. to any one in defence services. Your efforts for Lt Cols. is commendable but the benifit to all no cut out date should be accepted. I will write to you on some very imp. point if a reply received. God bless
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.