If a state has reservations, can Centre override: CJI
Related
Top Stories
- Spot-fixing: Chandila was in touch with four sets of bookies, says Delhi Police
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives, to hold talks with PM on boundary, water issues
- IPL 2013 LIVE SCORE: Regular wickets put Pune Warriors on top
- Blast accused death: UP govt seeks CBI probe, FIR against 42 persons
- Afghan Prez to seek Indian military aid amid Pakistan row

In a reference to the row over the allocation of coal blocks, Chief Justice of India S H Kapadia today questioned whether the Centre should have the power to "whittle down" policies framed by state governments.
Making it clear that he was not commenting on the merits of the case, Justice Kapadia said scams needed to be analysed through the constitutional principles of federalism and centre-state relations. In this context, he questioned whether the Centre could override policies decided by states. "If land is a State subject, what is the implication, if State has reservations on a policy, can the Centre override it," he asked.
Speaking on 'The Jurisprudence of Constitutional Structures', Justice Kapadia quoted the judgement in the S R Bommai case by Justice Jeevan Reddy in which he had observed that India's constitution was not strictly federal, and that power was tilted toward the Centre. "However, Justice Reddy observed that did not mean that the Centre could whittle down the powers of the state," he said.
Justice Kapadia also said judges should not govern the country or decide policy matters based on their "own philosophy".
"Judges should not govern this country. Whenever you lay down a law, it should not interfere with governance. We are not accountable to people," he said.
He also cautioned the judiciary against framing policies that could not be enforced by the government. "Questions which judges must ask if it is capable of being enforced. Judges must apply enforceability test. Today if a judge proposes a policy matter, government says we are not going to follow, are you going by way of contempt or implement it," he asked.
Lamenting the fact that not enough time was being devoted to research on jurisprudence and the Constitution, Justice Kapadia said that courts have to give appropriate weightage to the text of the Constitution while giving policy decisions.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Quake-hit and shaken, Bhaderwah spends nights in the open
- UP blast accused dies on way to jail, govt wanted to drop case against him
- Former civil aviation secy changes mind, seeks airport security exemption as EC
- BCCI suspects Gujarat players in other teams were also approached
- Police on money trail, Sreesanth in fresh trouble
- Chhattisgarh 'encounter' leaves 8 villagers dead, no Maoist link yet
- Chinese Premier Li Keqiang arrives today, PM to seek early revival of border talks


'Railway official was eyeing lucrative electrical post'
Bansal won't quit, Congress decides to weather new crisis
Sarabjit Singh cremated with state honours
SC: Kalam favoured clemency for Assam convict, MHA kept Pratibha in dark




















