You are here: IE »   Story

Ignore Ramadoss' views on gay sex: Govt to HC

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Ramadoss med
    Govt told Delhi HC not to consider Anbumani Ramadoss’s views on legalising gay sex among consenting adults.
    Discount UK Shopping

    Under flak for taking contradictory stands on the law against homosexuality, the Government on Monday told the Delhi High Court not to consider Union Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss’s views on legalising gay sex among consenting adults and said Section 377 of the IPC was “the will of Parliament and the people, how so wrong it may be”.

    “Your Lordships can ignore the statements of the Minister... his statements cannot change the law,” said Additional Solicitor General (ASG) P P Malhotra on Monday before a Bench of Chief Justice A P Shah and Justice S Muralidhar.

    The Centre also repeatedly told the Bench to ignore an embarrassing affidavit from the Home Ministry equating “the crime of widow re-marriage” with homosexuality and lesbianism.

    “One will not go by what the affidavit says, one will not go by what the minister says, one will only go by what the Constitution says... one will only see if the fundamental rights of any person are affected,” the ASG said.

    Ads by Google

    When Chief Justice Shah assured that the court would reach an independent conclusion — “not based on what your minister says or the Law Commission says” — the Centre tried to probe the power of the Bench itself to “change” Section 377. “Judges cannot make or scrap the law, they can only interpret it. Section 377 IPC is the will of Parliament, the will of the people, no matter how wrong it may be,” said the ASG.

    Malhotra repeated the same talking to 'The Indian Express' after the hearing. The hearing will continue on Tuesday.

    HomosexualityBy: vinayak | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Home minister is so ineffective and spineless that he says that he is in that position because of Sonia Gandhi. Her opinion on the subject is not known, but is likely to be in line with Pope's `fatwa' on the subject. Courts are really secular, they are not psudo-secular
    Same sexBy: sundar | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward It is so refreshing to hear atleast one of the central ministe's talks about same sex makes sense. It is said that homosexual feeling is physiological and not by choice. The government should appoint a committee of medical personnel to ascertain the facts before rubbishing the minister who is a doctor. In my view same sex can be decriminalized but same sex marriage should not be legalized since marriage is the union between a man and a woman.
    ArchaicBy: R. Jain | 01-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Courts may not be able to make laws. Courts can certainly scrap laws if the judges think that the laws are unconstitutional. What nonsense is the ASG spewing?It is sad to see the archaic language and mentality of the govermnet officials in dealing with 21st century issues.I just hope that the judges have the wisdom and courage to progressively interpret the constitution and ensure equality.
    RamodassBy: Anjana | 30-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward Has Ramodass done any useful work since his apointment. He should be sacked immediately. We have right to say so since we taxpayers pay his salary. Including a bunglow in the heart of the city, whole salary package is not less than Rs 2 lakhs per month. It is total waste of our tax. A country with 500 million people live less than 40Rs per day cannot fford that. There is much better use of the salary we are paying to him.
    Gay/Male RightsBy: Parthasarathy | 30-Sep-2008 Reply | Forward Gay rights should be seen in the light of male rights. Both are seen as a 'dirty male idea'. Unfortunate, but true!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.