You are here: IE »   Story

India should build asymmetric warfare capabilities: Antony

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • AK Antony
    AK Antony has spoken about how Indian military should try and counter the growth of larger armed countries.
    Discount UK Shopping

    With gaps in the military capabilities of India and China growing, Defence Minister A K Antony on Monday said the country should "build" asymmetric warfare capabilities to counter threats from larger armed forces.

    "We (Indians) need to conceptualise and build asymmetric capabilities against superior forces," Antony told the first Consultative Committee meeting of new Members of Parliament attached to the Defence Ministry, which dwelt on the Indian Air Force (IAF) strengths and weaknesses, here.

    He said the government's endeavours were aimed at ensuring the IAF's capabilities are in consonance with India's stature, aspirations and threat perceptions, and it was taking a series of steps to develop the IAF into a "dominant aerospace power."

    The Defence Minister said the steps included enhancing significantly the strategic reach of IAF to operate effectively far away from the Indian mainland and integrating potent capabilities in terms of space-based assets, air defence, surveillance, modern aircraft and advanced weapon systems.

    Ads by Google

    Referring to the perspective plans of the Armed Forces, he said the gestation period for induction of new equipment was long and, therefore, there should be clarity in strategic assessments and projection of requirements.

    "We need to hasten our procurements to prevent voids in defence preparedness," he added.

    Antony said efforts are also being made in the Defence Ministry and its various wings to ensure that the country reached the level of developed countries in defence technologies, without going through all the intermediate steps.

    "In our drive for modernisation and in execution of our daily tasks, we must be ever mindful of economy and avoid waste or duplication. We must lend our shoulders to indigenisation and think of ways in which we can reach the level of advanced states without necessarily following all the intermediate steps," he said.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Good talk but no sauceBy: Arun | 19-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward How about creating a militia and loosening the gun control laws? Better yet, distribute guns to everyone and train them in their proper usage as well as teach them responsibility. Let the commies try to invade a country where most citizens have a gun...
    Defence PreparednessBy: V K Das | 17-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Our politicians are more interested in lecturing and advising rather than doing what they advise should be done. We would like to know what this minister has done to prepare the Armed Forces for their role during war and peace. It is a sad commentery on the efficiency of the ministry of defence that we are short of officers to the extent of 25% and guns 50%. Nothing has been done to address this vast deficiency. We only hear advice and lectures while the defence of the country is in the hands of illequipped and leaderless soldiers who are ever ready to sacrifice their lives for the country.
    Indian Defense Forces.By: Prof.P.D.Gupte | 17-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Any nation's defence policy is as per Nation's political phylosophy.India's political phylosophy fom it's independence is "Live and let live",without streching our boundries.Since beginning we were just maintaining our Defence budget just to maintain thoughtful force,without enchroachment plan.I am proud and salute my Defence forces for thier bravery and work they have done with dedication to the country.We were not expecting threats from any nation,but in recent and in 1962 taught us that freinds can become foes,hence we started developing and augmenting.Our forces are there to defend and not for offend.
    DetenteBy: Bharat | 19-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Prof.PDG: Your way of thinking is completely combatible with what Mr. Kuldip Nayar expressed recently whereby Indo-pak border should be kept open for people of both countries to move in freely. KN might not have thought about the apocalypse this free movement could have brought to India.
    hiiiiBy: raaz | 17-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward super good...nice
    A shame By: robert | 17-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward I forgot to mention one of the biggest jokes and scandals - the LCA - since 1975 we have been designing it. After millions of dollars of waste and blaming sanctions we want a foreign partner! We don't even have a wind tunnel! Same for the radar dome aircraft. It crashed and we had to buy from Israel. Now watch for how we are going to be fooled into spending on another home grown pride: the 'soldier of the future' program. Our scientists read the latest foreign journals and use high flowing technical terminology to appropriate more and more funds that yield little. More empty talk. But like we Indians say "chalta hai". So whhhat yaaar!
    LCABy: Akash | 27-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward This is a typical uneducated remark made by somebody who does not have the first clue about the LCA. The LCA design was begun in 1988, not 1975! India does have wind tunnels, several of them, including at NAL, which is used for all of India's programs and a hypersonic wind tunnel is also being made for future programs. I think robert would be better educated if he read something about the LCA then watching zaid hamid programs.
    Need to rise step by stepBy: Vinay | 17-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward To even get a foreign partner we need to reach a technological level. Find out if 20 yrs ago was any country ready to develop aircraft in collaboration - NO. But, now we have technology transfer agreements, localization, etc because we have some capabilities. & money spend on R&D is not lost as it's peanuts when compared to procurement from overseas.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.