Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Implementation of Forest Rights Act causes ‘bureaucratic confusion’

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Forest act
    Tribal Development and Forest departments at loggerheads over conflicting interests in land claims

    The implementation of the Scheduled Tribes and Other Traditional Forest Dwellers (Recognition of Forest Rights) Act 2006, popularly known as the Forest Rights Act, is now causing ‘bureaucratic confusion’ between the Department of Tribal Development and the Forest and Environment Department.

    THE issue pertains to the conflict of interests between the Forest Rights Committees and the Forest Protection Committees.

    The Rights Committee is constituted in every village by the Tribal Development Department (TDD) under Section 6(1) of the Forest Rights Act, for the verification of land claims by the tribals before they are screened and approved at the taluka and district levels.

    The Committee is granted access to non-timber forest products and share in timber revenue in return for protecting the forests from fire, grazing and illegal harvesting as well as carrying out plantation works.

    Ads by Google

    The Protection Committee is constituted by the Forest and Environment Department under its Centrally-sponsored Joint Forest Management scheme, and though both committees involve the local village communities, they perceive their interests as conflicting in nature.

    This is evident from such incidents reported in the Devgadh Baria taluka of Dahod district, where the Protection Committee members vehemently opposed the land claims submitted to the gram panchayat by the Rights Committee.

    Roop Singh Chauhan, Secretary, Eklavya Sangathan, an organisation based in Limkheda village in Dahod that has been fighting for tribal forest rights said: ”Nearly 200 such cases have come to our notice where the land claims have been contended in the gram sabhas. The Protection Committees do it, as larger forest cover means larger incentives by the Forest Department.”

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.