The early reviews were glowing. The media compared her to George Marshall, marveled at her “perfectionist drive” and parsed “the Condi doctrine”. But she was only doing things that most secretaries of state do routinely.

The problem was that, in the course of counseling George W Bush, she fell under his tutelage much more than vice-versa. Instead of informing his instincts, she formalised them into doctrine, and came to believe in it herself.

In his second inaugural address, Bush declared that his main goal would be to end tyranny and spread democracy around the world. Rice took it as signs that the world was spinning on a new axis.

Rice had spun 180 degrees from the positions she’d held for the previous 30 years. In the mid-1970s, as a graduate student at the University of Denver, she’d been the star pupil of Josef Korbel (the father of former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright.

In the late 1980s, Brent Scowcroft, President George H W Bush’s National Security Adviser, hired Rice onto his staff. While advising Bush’s son during his 2000 presidential campaign, Rice remained firmly in this mold.

Cynics ascribed it to a psychological complex about powerful male tutors.

At times this year, Rice seems to have returned to her realist roots, most notably in striking a quick nuclear disarmament deal with North Korea.

Finally, there looms Iraq. This war has been Rice’s war as much as anybody’s in the administration. Long after her celebrity and charm have been forgotten, her epitaph will endure: She pursued democracy at the expense of stability, and achieved neither.