You are here: IE »   Story

India depends on Russia for indigenous aircraft carrier too

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    India may find little room for negotiations after Moscow demanded three times the original price for the Admiral Gorshkov aircraft carrier, as its indigenous Air Defence Ship (ADS) is now fully dependent on Russian carrier borne fighters due to delays in DRDO’s naval Light Combat Aircraft (LCA) project.

    With the first prototype of the naval LCA to take flight at the earliest by 2010, India’s first indigenous aircraft carrier — christened the Indian Aircraft Carrier (IAC) — will only have Russian MiG 29 K fighters onboard.

    The naval LCA project is lagging behind time — even after the prototype flies, it will need a redesign and new engines. The IAC is going ahead as per schedule and the kneel laying ceremony will be held in Koch next week. The 40,000 ton aircraft carrier will be ‘launched’ into the waters by 2011 and would enter service by 2014.

    Ads by Google

    India is now ordering 29 additional ship borne fighters from Russia for the IAC in a deal expected to be worth $2 billion. These would be in addition to the 16 MiG 29 K fighters that were part of the original deal signed for the Gorshkov in 2004.

    With the Gorhskov deal tied up with the fate of the ship borne MiG fighters, India is fully dependant on Russia for both its future aircraft carriers. Experts say that even at blistering pace, the naval LCA will take close to a decade before induction. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) Chief Ashok Baweja confirmed that the first Naval LCA will take to the skies only by next year.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    The deal is justifiedBy: Abhishek | 17-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward Personally i don't think there is anything wrong in getting an old carrier.....Do u even know the cost of a brand-new aircraft carrier...it is definitely something around 8-10 billion.... So, getting an old refitted carrier for abt 2.3 billion is not a bad bargain......The issue is not the cost....it is the delay that will result in inducting goroshkov.......India is moving towards indigenisation of its armed forces...lets hope that we succeed in building the desi carrier on time...that would be an achievement.......remember the chinese so far have failed in the many attempts they made in buiding a carrier themselves....i hope the next carrier we plan would be N-powered....
    come india By: suresh | 23-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward i am little confuse why country like india is going for decond hand aircraftcarrier. there are lots of man power and technology within ourself and we should fullly utilise all those thing. there is also scarcity of time that LCA has not entered it final stage. m so worried that there lack a military prepardness of our country. we should odernise our army, navy and airforce with indegenious weapon not a second hand that are imported from other countries.
    India depends on Russia for indigenous aircraft carrier tooBy: Suresh Rao | 08-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Scrap the Gorshkov deal ! ! ! Enough of second hand 'hand me downs'. Either we get a brand new Aircraft carrier which will serve full 30 years or nothing at all and the Indian Navy will be non the worse for it.It might be worth the effort and trouble to try for a brand new French "Charles De Gaulle" class nuclear propelled Aircraft carrier rathjer than this 30 year old reliccalled the Gorshkov
    Do we need a CarrierBy: SK Suresh | 21-Feb-2009 Reply | Forward A Carrier in the Indian Context is like White Elephant. The defence policy always goes hand in hand with the foreign policy. If India is a peace loving country with no policy towards intervention, why is the Carrier required. Its great expense is completely out of proportion to its usefulness. Instead, with the new low intensity conflict at sea, it would be better to invest in smaller platforms. A Carrier is not worth it, notwithstanding what some foolish Admiral might say about it. From what my friends in the Navy tell me, the Vikrant and Viraat have spent more time in harbour than at sea. Perhaps the CAG could throw some light on the number of days the Carrier has spent at sea and the costs for keeping this useless metal bucket.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.