You are here: IE »   Story

'India has simulation capability, N-tests not needed'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    Joining issue with an ex-DRDO scientist that Pokhran-II was not a full success and India needs to go for a few more nuclear tests, Atomic Energy commission chief Anil Kakodkar on Wednesday said the country has strong simulation capability and that additional tests were not required.

    "We have enough data. We have comprehensive simulation capability and therefore there is no need for any more tests," Kakodkar said, days after K Santhanam ignited a controversy that Pokhran-II was a fizzle and did not give the desired yield. "We are very confident about the simulation capability,"

    Indian nuclear scientists had already validated and bench marked the validated tool of the three dimensional simulation for earth motion and displacement data collected following Pokhran II tests in 1998, he said.

    "We used the data of Beneberry nuclear tests of US of December 18,1970 to validate our 3-D simulation for earth motion and displacement and this validated tool was used for bench marking," Kakodkar said.

    Ads by Google

    There is no need for series of tests to validate the yield since the tool and also observations are available, he said adding that it was published in the international journal Nuclear Technology in 2006 four years after its communication from Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC).

    Scaling up of nuetronic calculation can always be done, he said adding that all the observations and calculations were done by scientists from BARC.

    Please not in the nuclear fieldBy: vijay | 22-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Our status so far in country made defense equipments.Arjuna tank - a failure after almost 2 decades,Light combat aircraft { LCA } yet to take off with satisfaction,no naval big time vessel,nuclear submarine yet on trail after a good two decades,Chandrayan yet under trail,Rocketry so far so good ,still we have to import simple equipments for the army,navy,the fear of shortage of spares always is there in the air force. THE NUCLEAR AREA SHALL NOT BE DIFFERENT let us accept the view of Mr Sanantam and do not follow people like Anil khodokar who once upon a time opposed INDO-US deal until he was made to switch sides,The less said about NSA Narayann the better,he is a simple sycophant babu.Let us not be forces to sign CTBT and Other such treaty.MMS seem to have no foresight, Sonia's prime interest is to make Raoul PM,BJP is licking its wound and shall do so for a long time. The status of English media both print and electronic is well known. So TAKE CARE
    Simulation is not enoughBy: khandu patel | 17-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward It is quite clear that the scientists were bamboozled into making the 1998 tests well before they were ever ready to make them. The reservations expressed by many nuclear scientists in the run up to the nuclear agreement with the US but chose not to go public has to be taken seriously. Sanathan's coming out of the cold has revealed what I feared most: India does not have a credible deterrence. In case our leading scientists who have come to the defence of the government do not understand what in political parlance is meant by nuclear deterrence: it is the tested and proven nuclear strike capability. An untested and theoratical capability would not deter China with its proven nuclear weapons, and probably not Pakistan either with their passed down Chinese blue prints. The uncertainty in India's nuclear capability has emboldened China and Pakistan on their attacks. The deficiency is serious and needs to be resolved fast. There can be no question of signing up to the CTBT.
    Pokharan's N-Test failureBy: gautam | 16-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Well this has to do with country's nuclear capability to counter threats posed by China and Pakistan combine.If Santhanam publicly claims that test didnot produce desired results then there must be some truth in it.Nothing should be left to chances and additional test be carried out to perfect technology.
    atleast consider his cas3eBy: nitin | 05-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward instead of criticising him we should atleast relook what exactly he is trying to say. Being patriotic is not just a solution if we havnt achieved out goals then we need to rework in this direction.we have missile technology also and having gone with many test our missile still go fail as recent case of agni 2, test are must and moreover he is not going to get anything from making such comments.If he is true then its really a serious matter.
    Pokhran - 2 nuclear controversyBy: R.Venkatesh | 03-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Our scientists may be experts in physics but there seems to be too little commonsense left in them. Had they ever realized the fact that the price they are paying for their irresponsible comments (of claiming that our Phokran - 2 tests were just a fizzle) are nothing but to insinuate Pakistan in to military adventures against us. One really wonders whether the recent haste with which Pakistan is altering their U.S acquired harpoon missiles and other surveillance aircrafts to target major Indian positions, is bolstered in to believing that India, after all, is really not a nuclear power. Even if the intensions of the scientists is to circumvent the signing of the NPT protocols by claiming to have not done any conclusive or successful nuclear tests in 1998, how can they be justified in to denigrating the dignity and respect of the whole nation in the glare of all the national and international media? Their differing views on such a sensitive issue involving our national honor, especially in today’s volatile south Asian nuclear situation, only makes us yearn for a leader of the stature of Sardar Vallabhai Patel who could make everyone fall in line for the cause of our national good. R.Venkatesh,3-A.Ramachandrapuram,Thennur,Trichy – 620017,
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.