You are here: IE »   Story

India Inc calls Obama 'protectionist'

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Barack obama
    'It's a tax code that says you should pay lower taxes if you create a job in Bangalore.'
    Discount UK Shopping

    India Inc described the US President Barack Obama's announcement to punish American firms by levying high taxes on their outsourcing business as "protectionist" and a retrograde measure that, it said, will hurt the US companies.

    "Taking measures that would force companies to restrict their economic activities in one vision and not in the other is a retrograde step," the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) said.

    FICCI President Harsh Pati Singhania said while Obama's move would have some impact on the US investment abroad and into India, in the long run this would only run counter to the interest of US corporations seeking global presence.

    Obama had said on Monday that the US would stop letting American firms which create jobs abroad take deduction on their expenses in their tax liabilities.

    "It's a tax code that says you should pay lower taxes if you create a job in Bangalore, India, than if you create one in Buffalo, New York," Obama said.

    Ads by Google

    Criticising the US President's announcement, Assocham President Sajjan Jindal said, "Taking resort to protectionist tendency will kill the spirit of competition... and dilute the spirits of WTO."

    He said an American survey recently found that the US benefited ten times more than the countries where it outsourced jobs.

    Another tail-spin has been initiated...By: CK Raju, Thrissur | 06-May-2009 Reply | Forward Indian SEZs are now set to vaporise. If it materialises, then it would the first incident of its kind. An act purely created to satisfy the needs of mega corporates and conglomerates to earn more non-taxable profits - a notorious one like SEZ Act - has now become a graveyard for the mega investors. A blind and deaf, yet highly vocal NASSCOM and their brainless heads who repeatedly made irresponsible statements regarding future scope of IT markets, have played a crucial role in causing an avalanche here. Now, imagine the plight of little small-time investors who have put their belongings into stock markets, having lost everything earlier. Who will compensate their losses now ? Will NASSCOM do it ? Will Chidambaram help them ? Will Manmohan help them ? Will all those MPs who silently approved the SEZ Act, which paved the way for massive investments - 90% - in all, in the Indian soil, compensate ?
    PROTECTIONISM IN INDIABy: Niranjan | 06-May-2009 Reply | Forward WE HAVE BEEN PRACTICING PROTECTIONISM FOR SO LONG THAT WE ARE LIKE A POT CALLING A KETTLE BLACK. FOR A LONG TIME A PERSON FROM ONE STATE CANNOT GO TO STUDY IN ANOTHER STATE AND WHOEVER DOES, IS CONSIDERED AN OUTSIDER EVEN IF THE FAMILY HAS SETTLED DECADES AGO. A PERSON NOT SEAKING THE LOCAL LANGUAGE IS CONSIDERED AN OUTSIDER. AT THE TOURIST STOPS WE CHARGE FROEIGNERS EXHORBITANT AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR EVEN ENTRANCE AND CHARGE EXTRA FOR EVEN CARRYING A CAMERA OR VIDEO EQUIPMENT. IF DISNEY IN USA OR TOKYO CHARGES PEOPLE BASED ON THEIR RACE OR PLACE OF ORIGIN, WE WILL SCREAM BLOODY MURDER. ALSO, IF THE TAX STRUCTURE ALLOWED TAX DEDUCTIONS FOR EMPLOYING FOREIGNERS, WE WOULD ALSO FIND FAULT WITH THEM. SO, LOOK AT THYSELF BEFORE YOU FIND FAULT WITH OTHERS.
    WriterBy: J.R.Murthy | 06-May-2009 Reply | Forward It is about time that our President Obama wants American companies operating overseas to pay the same tax rate as other American companies in USA. These overseas companies pay a maximum of 2% in corporate taxes and it is not just the money which is nearly $21 Billions each year which is lost to the American tax payer. It is the employment. Overseas companies operating in countries such as India, hire the locals there for considerably lower wages and they take jobs away from equally or even better qualified American workers. What is wrong to ask them to pay the same tax rate as their fellow US companies in the USA?
    Elimination of Subsidies By: Arvind K Mathur | 06-May-2009 Reply | Forward Why should US companies who export jobs get a subsidy and the companies that dont - not get any. The elimination of a subsidy does not mean taxes. They will be at par with the companies that dont export jobs. What is wrong with that? Why should the US government give an incentive NOT to employ US citizens?
    India Inc concerned about US interests?By: Adam | 06-May-2009 Reply | Forward Why should US companies get US tax dollars subsidies to hire people in India or China? They are not doing any service to US taxpayers and workforce.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.