Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

India not worried by G-8 decision on N-issue: Pranab

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Pranab mukherjee
    Pranab Mukherjee was External Affairs Minister when the Indo-US nuclear deal was signed.

    Government on Monday asserted that India was not worried by decision of G-8 nations to curb transfer of some sensitive nuclear technology to non-NPT nations.

    The statement from Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee came after Left parties and the BJP were seen on the same side in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha demanding a discussion on the key issue.

    So far as the civil nuclear cooperation is concerned, the appropriate agency is IAEA and the 45-member NSG. We have got clean waiver from NSG. We are not deeply concerned (over G-8 declaration)...," Mukherjee told the Rajya Sabha.

    He was External Affairs Minister when the Indo-US nuclear deal was signed.

    In Lok Sabha, BJP Deputy Leader Sushma Swaraj said "we want a statement from the Prime Minister after a thorough discussion on the issue." Her colleague Murli Manohar Joshi remarked that the matter involved national sovereignty.

    Ads by Google

    Raising the issue in the Lower House, CPI(M) leader Basudeb Acharia recalled that government had said that it had got a clean waiver to acquire enrichment and reprocessing items. But the recent G-8 Summit decided to impose conditions in regard to the sale of such items.

    "What is the government's stand on the matter as the Prime Minister had attended the Summit where the conditions were imposed," Acharia said, demanding a clarification from the Prime Minister.

    Following the demands, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Pawan Kumar Bansal assured the Lok Sabha that he would bring the matter to the notice of the Prime Minister.

    In the Upper House, Mukherjee, who had signed India specific safeguards agreement with IAEA last year, was responding to opposition members' concern on the G-8 declaration at Italy.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    India is really wirried..By: Dr.G.G.Rajan | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Mukherjee's high headed statement belies the truth.If the nuclear fuel is stopped, all our nuclear plants will come to a grinding halt, if not immediately. but sometime later.This was an unwarranted high headed statement lacking diplomacy.Had the statement been more diplomatic, polite and intelligent, we may even get the fuel from non supporting countries.This is the difference between an intelligent Diplomat and an insolent goof.
    Civilian nuke dealBy: Ramamurthy.N | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Mr.Pranab's statement Indai doesn't bother about G8 directive on nuke deal sinse it is concerned with IAEA and NSG is the best joke of the year.IAEA and NSG are not autonomas and act as per the dict of US,which was evident when India discussed the issue last year with them.The so called India specific agreement and clean waviar with IAEA and NSG, the text of which yet to be known,were concluded under pressure from US only.These are realy not agreement but only a MOU, which also worded against our interests, and the US stated showing its real colour when working agreements are being negotiated.We have lsot four valueble years in the process, since from 2007 July when joint declaration with US was annonced , UPA govt have reduced funds allocation to nulcear developments.Even now Govt is trying to put a brave face in vain.
    Nuclear deal...By: Jem Hassan | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward I was so suprised to see some reckless comments from some people here, blaming UPA that nuclear deal has brought nothing for the nation and it is not realised yet.The fact is that, the clearance from the NSG had given a great boost for our quest for nulclear energy as of now we can enter in any nuclear deal with any nation.Nobody can stop us now unless and untill all those members in NSG decide to change their will.All these years we are stranded as we were prohibitted from aquiring any nuclear energy deal with any country.Now we already have made a deal with France.Even of 123 article puts some concerns over US willingness to supply the nuclear energy in the future,nobody can stop us from getting it from other nations.Now the egg is just layed...just wait for sometime to hatch the chicken...during the NDA rule, we had just controversaries of Jinnah..kandhahar...parliament attack..Gujarat riots..and internal conflicts of BJP and RSS which infact bruised our growth.Still they are same..
    Then for what this agrrement was signed?By: amit | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Well these old idiots when signed this treaty claimed,that this will bring nuclear fuel and technology access to Indians.Mind it we were getting Nuclear fuel from Russia already and thus accesses to nuclear technology as the main benefit of signing such a treaty was publicized by our Unelected PM manmohan singh and congress jokers.Now they have got a kick on there back....such idiotic comments are expected.
    G-8 vs IAEAand NSGBy: Giri Girishankar | 14-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward How can India be not worried by the decision of the G-8 nations to curb transfer of some sensitive nuclear technology to non-NPT nations? Mr. Mukherjee has spent a lot of time discussing the 123 Agreement and should feel comfortable with the Indian Government’s position. However, what is the likelihood that the IAEA and the 45 member NSG will tell the G-8 nations to go fly a kite. If they do, that will be the first time. Is the 123 Agreement falling victim to the new Administration in the US? The situation requires a frank and detailed public discussion so that India’s response is based on the combined wisdom of the Parliament and not that of the Congress alone. It should be made clear to the US that India cannot be taken lightly.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.