You are here: IE »   Story

India rumbles over Sri Lanka war, but to what end?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping
    Indian political pressure on Sri Lanka to throttle back an offensive to wipe out the Tamil Tigers will do little to sway a Sri Lankan government increasingly confident it can end one of Asia's longest insurgencies.

    Despite threats from Tamil politicians at home, India is loath to repeat its disastrous 1980s intervention in the war on its doorstep, leaving Sri Lanka free to wage a military campaign that has energised President Mahinda Rajapaksa's political base.

    "The military is very unlikely to stop now, because this is the government's key political agenda item," said Maria Kuusisto, an analyst with Eurasia Group. "Now when they have gone this far, to backtrack would be a negative."

    Prime Minister Manmohan Singh this week expressed concern at the escalation in the conflict, which has raged on and off for 25 years, and called for a negotiated settlement.

    Ads by Google

    Singh's comments, which echoed India's existing diplomatic stance, were described by analysts as pre-election manoeuvres by a government that must call a national poll by May 2009.

    The UPA is under pressure from his allies in Tamil Nadu, where the mainly Tamil population accuses largely Sinhalese Sri Lanka of trying to wipe out the island's Tamils.

    And despite his criticism, Singh also endorsed Sri Lanka's position that the country must not allow the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) to split the Indian Ocean island nation in two, nor tolerate the actions of a group on US, EU and Indian terrorism lists.

    "India loves to play all sides, and has always done that," said Reva Bhalla, an analyst with the US private intelligence firm Stratfor.

    "They can cater to the Tamil politicians and benefit from the Tigers' military capability going down without taking too much political risk."

    Underscoring India's dual-track approach to Sri Lanka, furious denials erupted from Colombo and New Delhi last month after two Indian radar technicians were injured in a Tiger assault on a Sri Lankan military base.

    Rajapaksa later said the men were providing after-sales service to radars India's Bharat Electronics sold to the military. India has also helped Sri Lanka intercept Tiger boats, which it considers a threat to national security, analysts say.

    INTERVENTION OUT

    Brewing diplomatic tension has been bubbling since the radar fiasco, with ethnic Tamil politicians increasingly echoing the Tigers' charge that the war is ‘genocide’. The LTTE for years has funded politicians in Tamil Nadu.

    The threat comes as Sri Lanka, which has vowed to crush the Tigers militarily this year, says its troops are 2 km from the rebel capital of Kilinochchi, a strategic and symbolic target.

    On Wednesday, the complaints peaked when 39 legislators from Tamil Nadu state threatened to resign from Singh's ruling Congress party-led coalition if India did not stop the Sri Lankan advance within two weeks.

    Stratfor's Bhalla, echoing a widely-held view, said there was no chance of direct intervention given the history India's humiliating 1987-1990 peacekeeping mission, in which it lost more than 1,200 soldiers and was accused of human rights violations.

    Sri Lanka's intensified offensive over the last three months has produced the bloodiest fighting since the government officially annulled a 2002 ceasefire in January, and sent 230,000 people fleeing their homes in a growing humanitarian crisis.

    "The last thing India would want is an influx of refugees to its territory," G Parthasarthy, a former Indian diplomat and expert in Indo-Sri Lanka relations said.

    Thousands of refugees have poured across the narrow Palk Strait into Tamil Nadu repeatedly since the war started in 1983.

    Singh last month refused to meet Rajapaksa at the United Nations General Assembly in New York, which analysts say was a sign that he was unhappy with the progress of political negotiations on the Tamil issue.

    Rajapaksa's government has promised that devolution for Tamil areas in the north and east of the island would go hand-in-hand with its push to win the war.

    "A year ago the President had given repeated assurances that while the military component was going on, he would have a political package ready," Colombo-based analyst Iqbal Athas said. "The fact that process has not moved forward is why Singh didn't give him an appointment in New York."

    It also prompted Rajapaksa to call a meeting of the All Party Representative Committee (APRC), a panel designed to forge a political compromise, over the weekend and urge the Tigers to lay down their weapons and enter the democratic process, Athas said.

    A senior Sri Lankan government official said Rajapaksa's offer was not too different from the solution Singh had demanded.

    "The government agrees that the concerns of the minority must be addressed through a political process, which is already on train," the official said on condition of anonymity, referring to the APRC.

    re: Sri LankaBy: Hema | 29-Mar-2009 Reply | Forward Why is India not helping by sending food
    Dont cheatBy: johnson | 25-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Rajapakse is cheating Manmohan singh by saying that he will bring peace and equality.
    Let the Chinese come...By: Ajit Aryasingha | 21-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward In order to counterbalance Indian pressure on our country Sri Lanka, we must allow China to put up military bases and weapons on our soil, just as Poland did recently, agreeing to install American missiles in their country to counterbalance Russian threats on them.
    Evil actBy: johnnny | 25-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Don't make our Indian prime minister to become a war criminal like rajapakse.
    India rumbles over Sri Lanka war, but to what end?By: Vijaya | 20-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward The establishments in New Delhi in charge of defence and security of the county are inept to counter the massive military build up taking place in Sri Lanka. The sophisticated military hardware, including fighter-bombers and rockets, supplied clandestinely by sources that are hostile to the country. The acquisition of these weapons by the administration of Rajapaksa brothers, under the pretext of fighting terrorism, has military objectives beyond the periphery of fighting terrorism i.e. for offensive capability against India. (The welcoming ceremony to the Lankan defence minister Rajapaksa with unusual mark of distinction at the Red Square and Kremlin is a chilling development adversely affecting India’s security from the vicinity and from all directions- and Pakistan and China are the leading players in the India bashing game.)
    INDIA: Its Time to ActBy: Gaurav Deshmuk | 19-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Its time for the parties in T.Nadu to join hands forgetting the differences.Due to strict censorship in the srilankan media what comes out is not real.Daily innocent people are killed.In an interview Srilankan Army Chief Lt. Gen. Sarath Fonseka," We being the majority of the country, 75%, we will never give in and we have the right to protect this country. We are also a strong nation. They can live in this country with us. But they must not try to, under the pretext of being a minority, demand undue things," he was quoted as saying.Those comments by the Army Chief drew criticism from several political parties including the UNP and the SLMC.Is it clear that this country exclusively belongs to a particular community?How can one expect any sort of humanity from the rest of the army?India has to intervene into the matter immediately before tamil race from SL is wiped out.Demands from the Tamilnadu is clear and loud"Save the Innocent Tamil People".Its Time for India to ACT
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.