You are here: IE »   Story

India, US and Burma's Unity

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Discount UK Shopping

    India has every reason to welcome US President Barack Obama's new engagement with the Burmese government that could help end the prolonged international isolation of our eastern neighbour so critical to our internal security and Asian strategy.

    For years now Delhi had cautioned Washington against the policy of isolating Burma and urged the US to recognise the genuine insecurities of the Burmese ruling elite. In a speech at Tokyo that set the tone for his first presidential tour of Asia, Obama has made a long overdue political gesture to Burma's military rulers.

    In explicitly underlining the American support for Burma's territorial integrity, Obama was offering reassurance to the Generals who see themselves as the sole custodians of the nation's unity and fear that political reform might unleash uncontrollable ethnic warfare.

    Even the most trenchant critics of Burmese military rule have argued that Western support for the nation's unity and territorial integrity must be an early critical step in any international effort to promote internal political change.

    Ads by Google

    In Tokyo, Obama did precisely that. "We support a Burma that is unified, peaceful, prosperous, and democratic. And as Burma moves in that direction, a better relationship with the United States is possible," Obama said in Tokyo.

    Obama's public emphasis on Burma's national unity is believed to be part of the broader political framework for the bilateral engagement that had been negotiated in recent weeks between the two sides.

    The Obama Administration has also consulted Aung San Suu Kyi, who is the voice of Burma's democratic aspirations in reversing the previous American policies. This framework is said to lay out a series of reciprocal actions that will lead to the end of US and Western sanctions against Burma.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Myanmar or Burma, check out the ChineseBy: Umesh | 19-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward If the international community would not get into solving this mklitary junta in Burma, one day you all we see the Chinese sitting at the helm and say, Burma is a part of China, as they did with Tibet and planning to do with Arunachal Pradesh. It is of my opinion that the military junta is in that position only because of the support from China. China dont need any neighbouring country being developed and any tilt feeling that they will develop in future, hence play all dirty game with all teh neighbouring countries whom they can flex their muscle. Hence solving of Burma probelm is more important for India than any other country in the world.
    A new intiativeBy: Anubhav Bhargava | 18-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward This seems to be a good step from the President Obama. It was much required. We do not hear very often any news from Burma. This nation seems to be in the oblivion though it can play a crucial role in India's security as far as any external aggresion is concerned. Of course India should try to bring out democratic reform in it neighbouring state and release of prominent leaders who are supporters of democracy like Ms. Aung San Suu Kyi.
    India, US and Buma's UnityBy: Dr. Prasad Mothadaka | 18-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward What President Obama aspires is very much possible through Pacific partner (India) of USA. Burma believes more in India's intervention than any other country as evidenced by recent cyclone that had devastating affect on Burma. During that period Burma allowed only India's help not any other country. What is in need is development of people to people interaction that is taking place regularly across Moreh near Imphal and once in a week in Changlang District in Arunachal Pradesh. What is more important is that any international effort need to be on generation of number of avocations that can keep youth of Myanmar constructively busy.
    watch for big boysBy: Manoj Patil | 18-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Only time will tell, about Obama and its world apologize tour. If he keeps on travelling world, no one will take him seriously. Its good to have good friend in your neighbour but we have to watch for 'Chini log' for its influence. They got money and other neighbours, pak,nepal,b'desh just on their pay-roll. We need to make our vision strong to keep country strong to make our neighbours/friends stronger. With people like Lallu, Mamata, running govt. is it possible?.
    Any reason you're calling it Burma when it's MyanmarBy: Sihtric Anilla | 18-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward It's insulting to the Myanmarese to call their country by any other name than what they want. Wouldn't it be insulting to you if somebody kept insisting on using the colonial names of our cities instead of Mumbai, Chennai, etc? This is the second time I'm writing. If you keep rejecting my comments, I won't see any point in using or recommending your website. Are you a censor?
    Move on...By: KP | 18-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Do you call yourself Indian? India is not a word in any Indian language. You know that right? When you speak hindi you call it Bharat, when you speak English, you call it India. I chose to call my city Bombay. It's not about who gave the name. It's about what name we identify it with and love. Changing the name doesn't change your mentality. People who are so against Bombay are stuck in colonial times. We have moved on. We can call *our* city whatever we want.
    How about British BombayBy: Manoj Patil | 19-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward Good point. Goahead and call your city whatever you like and forget where you came from and what civlisation you belong too. Afterall Brits will be happy to read your comment, they got what they want few decades later when they left. bottom line is, We dont need anybudies identification to ourself to 'Move on'. We are happy to be called ourself what we care.
    Move on etc.By: Sihtric Anilla | 19-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward The name India, comes from the river Indus, part of erstwhile India. You wouldn't want your neighbours to rename your kids, no matter what they do or don't do for them, do you? By the way, what do you call the capital of China? Peking? The only reason for the opposition is due to the association with regional chauvinistic parties. Trust me, I don't support them.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.