Industrial area plan: Bold move, old obstacle
Top Stories
- IPL spot-fixing case: Net widens, police watching 3 more players, other bookies
- IPL 2013: Imperious Brad Hodge powers Rajasthan Royals to qualifier
- Sonia Gandhi, PM Manmohan Singh slam BJP for disrupting Parliament, stalling bills
- IPL spot-fixing: 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief's son-in-law, say cops
- Jessica Lall case: Shayan Munshi to face perjury trial

The policy announced by Industry Minister Narayan Rane and Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan on January 2 reckons the problems states face in bringing home investment. While they would still want to believe that their state retains its primacy in industry attractiveness, it is not hidden from them that competitive states such as Gujarat and Tamil Nadu have moved ahead. In India, the most critical factor of production is land today, particularly so in the backdrop of the proposed acquisition law that will make it prohibitive.
In the past 5-6 years, the state attracted as many as 124 proposals for SEZs spread over 29,000 hectares. The global meltdown and fall in exports demand prompted many companies to freeze their SEZ plans. Some others felt it was unviable after the Centre changed the tax goalposts mid-way and said SEZ companies would attract minimum alternate tax (MAT and dividend distribution tax). Of the 124 SEZs, only 17 spread over 2,400 hectares, are operational.
Chavan's new policy allows the rest to become IIAs, but mandates 60 per cent land use exclusively for industrial activity. While another 10 per cent of land can be used for commercial purposes, the remaining 30 per cent can be utilised to create social infrastructure such as housing, hotels, hospitals, recreational centres, etc. In SEZs, companies were required to use only 50 per cent of land for core activity.
NCP, bruised by graft allegations in award of irrigation projects, hopes to derive political mileage by projecting this as an anti-farmer move — taking away farmers' land to give it to industry. Far from it. Companies that proposed SEZs acquired land through direct negotiations with sellers. In fact, the state's township policy allows firms to set up large real estate commercial and residential projects after denotification of their SEZs.
Chavan's move channelises land for industrial development and will help create jobs and win votes. If it is for political gains that NCP is opposing the move, then this belief can't be more misplaced.
Vaidy is Editor, Mumbai pv.iyer@expressindia.com
Editors’ Pick
- Paddy shortfall blamed for mystery death of procurement officer
- 'Bookie' Vindoo was close to BCCI chief’s son-in-law: cops
- Net widens, police watching three more players, new set of bookies
- Suspected Islamists behead soldier on London street
- Malegaon 2006 case: NIA names four right wing terror suspects
- BJP invokes 'sarcasm, ridicule' against PM
- Nine years on, Sonia, PM put up show of unity, Singh hints at unfinished business


Jagan Mohan away, his party feels the heat
I-League needs change
Waiting, watching proved fruitful for Cong in Karnataka
Under him, they always scored




















