Insurance company ordered to compensate policy holder for non-payment of claim
Related
Top Stories
- Rs 20L seized from Ajit Chandila relative's home, another ex-cricketer held
- Indian American teen Eesha Khare invents wondrous 20-sec charger, Google eyes bid
- India and China ask SRs to work on more border steps
- Can't charge man with rape over consensual sex even if marriage eludes: Supreme Court
- Saudi Arabian authorities refuse to accept new Indian passports
The consumer alleged deficiency in service by the company as he was compelled to pay Rs 11,300 towards charges of medication and treatment due to denial of cashless facility by the company.
The National Insurance Company has been penalized by the UT Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum here for denying a cashless policy to a consumer for a medical treatment.
Rakesh Jaspal, a resident of Sector 39, stated in his complaint that he took out a medi-claim policy from the company in January 2011, by paying a premium of Rs 9,495 as premium.
A couple of days later, Jaspal, the complainant, fell ill and was admitted at the Fortis Hospital at Mohali where at the time of admission, he provided a copy of the cashless policy. During the treatment the hospital sought confirmation from Vipul Medicorp T P A Limited, a health facilitation company, about the cashless policy, which it denied.
Rakesh alleged deficiency in service by the company for the fact that he was compelled to pay Rs 11,300 towards charges of medication and treatment due to denial of cashless facility by the company. In its written reply, the insurance company submitted that merely obtaining cashless insurance policy did not mean that every claim would be paid to the insured.
They pleaded that according to the policy, it was a second renewal by the insurer and that coronary disease would be covered only after four continuous claim free years.
On examining the record, the forum observed that the policy was first taken by the complainant in 2005 and that the claim of the insurance company of it not been in continuation was rendered unjustified. Further, it observed that the complainant need not submit any bills as it was a cashless policy and the expense be paid directly to the hospital.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled six balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- IVF breakthrough can triple number of births: Scientists
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks


Life of Pi singer Bombay Jayashri to perform in Chandigarh
Theories of Sino-India war far-fetched, says ex-Army chief
HC rejects Punjab plea on Bhattal’s govt house
Civic body moots Rs 616-cr budget, discussion today




















