iPhone sales in India: CCI rejects abuse charges against Airtel, Vodafone, Apple
- Trouble mounts for Sreesanth as Mumbai cops gather more evidence
- SIT to seek Supreme Court guidance on Maya Kodnani death penalty issue
- Tamil Nadu police bans Yasin Malik-linked pro-Eelam public meeting
- Kings XI Punjab end IPL 2013 campaign with a win
- Narendra Modi: India losing sheen as agricultural nation
Fair trade regulator CCI today dismissed charges of anti-competitive practices and abuse of dominant market positions in agreements signed by telecom majors Airtel and Vodafone with global technology giant Apple with regard to the sale of iPhone smartphones in India.
The order, issued by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) today, follows an over one-and-a-half years probe by its investigative arm into complaints that Bharti Airtel, Vodafone (formerly known as Vodafone Essar), US-based Apple Inc and its Indian subsidiary abused the dominant positions in their respective markets for smartphones and GSM cellular services.
Apple makes the popular high-end smartphone device iPhone along with other products like Mac computers and iPad tablet PCs, while Airtel and Vodafone are two major telecom service providers of the country.
The CCI probe was focussed on a particular variant of iPhone, iPhone 3G/3GS and it was alleged that Apple had entered into "some secret exclusive contracts/agreements" with Airtel and Vodafone for sale of iPhone in India, even prior to its launch.
In the complaint filed by an individual, it was alleged that Airtel and Vodafone got exclusive selling rights for undisclosed number of years as a result of their respective agreements with Apple and they had abused their dominant market positions.
The complaint further said that iPhones sold by Vodafone and Airtel were compulsorily locked so that the handset purchased from either of them would work only on their respective networks and none other.
However, CCI said in its order that it did not find Apple Inc, Apple India, Vodafone and Bharat Airtel of being in a dominant position in their respective relevant market.
"No appreciable adverse effect on competition in the market of smart-phones and/or mobile service has been established...accordingly, the case is ordered to be closed," CCI said in its order.
Following receipt of the complaint, CCI had asked its Director General in August 2011 to probe into the allegations, but the investigation did not find any violations of competition laws in the agreements between the companies.
- Destitute, orphan students outclass rest in Andhra Class 10 exams
- To re-energise ties, PM wants to visit US, waits for confirmation
- NIA court says no terror link, frees 'Hizbul militant' Liyaqat on bail
- CBI arrests its coal allotments investigator on bribery charge
- ‘Cricketer-bookie Amit may have used Jiju to reach Sree’
- BCCI chief N Srinivasan says police must prove spot-fixing allegations