Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Israel bombardment

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Israel’s attack on Palestine has elicited an angry response in the Pakistani papers. In a furious editorial on December 29, The News remarked: “The mighty can kill and maim at will and the so-called protectors of human rights in Washington sit back and twiddle their thumbs. Is it then any surprise that Muslim radicalism is rising across the Islamic world? It seems apparent that the ruthless attack is intended to bolster support for the government in Israel before the country goes to polls in February. There is speculation that Tel Aviv also hoped to take advantage of the friendly Bush administration, in its last days in the White House.” Daily Times added: “Israel killed 280 people in retaliation against some rocket-fire from Gaza into the Israeli neighbourhood which killed no one. Many of the 300 critically wounded will die in the days to come, stoking the Islamist rage that the US President-elect Barack Obama was supposed to assuage.” Dawn joined the chorus on December 30 saying: “Wars are waged for territorial gains or regime change in another country. However, where Israel is concerned, this does not seem to be the case as its violence is aimed at the killing of civilian populations. The current Israeli operations demonstrate the Jewish state’s unending thirst for Palestinian blood. The Muslim world is powerless, while there is no countervailing power to tear up the carte blanche which America has given to Israel for its massacre of the Palestinian ...”

    “There is always a risk of exaggerating the prospects of peace breaking out between India and Pakistan, just as there is that irrepressible tendency to overplay the fear of war lurking round the corner,” the Dawn wrote on December 30. Underscoring the love-hate connect between the neighbours, it concluded “notwithstanding what high strategy might dictate, at least the recent deafening hysteria on both sides of the border is abating.” It celebrated India’s generosity in “repatriating 65 Pakistanis languishing in Indian jails, despite rising tension.”

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Israel bombardmentBy: Vijay | 04-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward It is ironic that India which just suffered a terrorist attack at the hands of Pakistani terrorists would side with a similiar terrorist group, Hamas. Hamas broke the cease-fire agreement and attacked Israel, and why is Israel not justified then in removing this terrorist threat? Would the writer rather have Israel do what Manmohan Singh and Pranab Mukherjee are doing; begging Pakistan to apprehend its terrorist groups? While we spend thousands of crores of rupees on our defence, but are unable even to prevent Bangladesh from sponsoring terror on our soil, Israel has the will to fight to defend itself. Just like we are surrounded by hostile neighbours who wish us no good, so is Israel. We should be with them, not with Hamas.
    Israel bombardment, and Hamas perfidyBy: Victor Williams | 03-Jan-2009 Reply | Forward It is astounding to see yet more justification of terrorist activity, and in a nation which just experienced it again firsthand. To repeat boldfaced lies only completes that picture. Israel, in attacking Gaza, is attempting to stop the daily barrage of rocketfire that Hamas has unleashed since it took over the strip in 2005. That few are physically hurt by those rockets speaks to the Hamas incompetence, but their intent. They publicly state, and repeat, their goal to kill civilians and destroy Israel. Israel, on the other hand, works very hard to avoid civilian casualties, as should be apparent to anyone who reads the news. If they didn't, the death toll would be much higher. Hamas, however, uses this to their advantage, attacking from populated areas, storing arms in mosques, and the like. The leaders even travel with a cordon of schoolchildren, knowing Israel will be reluctant to attack. If only Hamas had the same reservations, Israeli children would be safer.
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.