Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

It ain’t broke

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Today, we are confronted not so much with Soviet success, but the crisis caused by excesses in the Western capitalist world. It is therefore tempting to discard the market-friendly model and our quest for economic reform and go back to renewed emphasis on state control, nationalisations and so on. That would be the wrong conclusion. No one denies that booms and slowdowns are embedded into capitalist economies. They are referred to as business cycles. But the important thing to note is that they have in them an in-built self-correcting mechanism. Markets sometimes give harsh messages. This results in mid-course corrections. In the Soviet Union, no harsh messages could be conveyed to the ruling elite for years on end until the system broke.

    The recent happenings in the global economy show the pendulum’s amplitude in the business cycle getting extended. Instead of a boom, we are faced with a bubble. Bubbles are a weakness of the market system. But the system cannot be judged as bad because of this weakness. We need to see what happens over a period of time as the consequences of both the positive and negative features are wrung out. If we consider long-term secular trends, the market system comes out ahead in terms of wealth creation and poverty elimination. If stock market wealth drops by 50 per cent in six months, we get concerned. We conveniently forget that it went up by 200 per cent over the previous two years. At the end of 30 months we are still 150 per cent ahead. It has been repeatedly shown that over a person’s earning and saving lifetime, regular monthly investments in the stock market always outperform investing in so-called safe government securities even taking into account the volatility of the ups and downs of equity. The right strategy to ensure that one has a financially sound retirement is to invest regularly in the equity markets, not to get scared and stick with so-called safe returns which will lead to capital erosion in the face of inflation, not capital preservation or appreciation.

    ... contd.

    PreviousNext1234
    Impact of Financial crisis on maths By: Gary | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Mr Rao,I like reading your articles and generally they convey a strong sense of intellect and pro-capitalist principles. However, it's painful to note that your maths remain rather week ... If markets go up 200 % and come down 50% ... the result is 100% net increase :-)May be it reflects the increased sales of calculators in our country ...
    Good articleBy: Madhup Rathi | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Excellent article. I wish our politicians are smart and long-sighted enough to understand this.
    It Ain't BrokeBy: Pradeep Bhatt | 06-Oct-2008 Reply | Forward Why do you call our Growth Rate during Nehru's Socialism as " Proverbial HINDU RATE OF GROWTH" ? What is Hindu about it? Did any Hindu organisation had formed that License Permit Raj Policy? Why denigrate Hindu religion
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.