Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

It’s better to be a defaulter, sulks Purshottam Das

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Even as hordes of farmers are celebrating the implementation of the agricultural debt waiver scheme in the state, Purshottam Das, a farmer from Barwala, is cursing the Government for not extending the benefits to law-abiding citizens like him.

    “Tell me why am I not a beneficiary of the loan waiver scheme? Is it my fault that I have been repaying the instalments on the Rs 45,000 loan that I took on May 30, 2007? Is it my fault to be honest? Why should I not get any benefit of the waiver while those who did not care to repay the loan have been bailed out?” he asks, still finding it very difficult to understand why his name does not figure in the name of the beneficiaries.

    “What justice is this and what is the message the Government wants to give to the farmers,” questions Purshottam Das.

    Das says having learnt his lesson now, he will be more careful next time he takes a loan. “I will make sure I don’t repay the loan. After all, it pays to be a defaulter rather than paying back instalments on time,” he says.

    Ads by Google

    The bank and credit society officials, too, are a worried lot. “Many farmers who were defaulters earlier are now eligible for fresh loans, after their dues being waived off. We fear they won’t pay the instalments in future as well,” says Gaman Arora, manager, State Bank of India, Barwala branch.

    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.