Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Jai kisan?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Congress leaders will make political capital out of the farm debt waiver. This is understandable, since that was the intention. Whether electoral dividends result is one issue, whether economic capital follows — altering India’s rural economy — is another. Also, will electoral campaigns find the clarity to step out of the rhetoric of the 20th century, and thereby see the opportunity to alter the terms of trade in favour of rural India?

    First, the crisis dates to the late ’80s, accentuated in the ’90s, with a fiscal crunch (Centre plus states) leading to the collapse of research and extension services, spliced with regulatory collapse leading to the proliferation of counterfeit seeds and fertilisers. Second, public investments in agriculture flagged and erratic power supply was combined with hike in power costs and there was a water problem too. Third, nothing was done to solve the rural credit problem. It is obvious that a farm debt waiver does nothing for those who borrow from money-lenders or don’t take out crop insurance and it creates perverse incentives for future borrowing, apart from messing up rural banking and penalising those who don’t default. It didn’t require the Radhakrishna Committee to point out that 50 per cent of rural credit is still informal and that high procedural costs and collateral requirements deter institutional borrowing. The answer lies in freeing up rural credit delivery, with the recognition that borrowing at 12 per cent (higher administrative costs, risk premiums) and getting credit is preferable to borrowing at 30 per cent (from money-lenders). It is also preferable to directed rates of 6 per cent when one doesn’t get credit. This problem has been ducked not only by the NDA, but also in the four years of the UPA. Fourth, rural credit cannot be de-linked from rural insurance, since large chunks of credit are for sudden exogenous shocks. That the present crop insurance doesn’t work and needs liberalisation is also known. Suicides are linked to exposure to risk consequent on commercialisation and diversification.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.