Jayalalithaa slams UPSC changes as 'retrograde', seeks PM's intervention
- Spot-fixing: Petition in SC seeks stay on IPL matches, seeks SIT probe
- India, China call for end to incursion issue, sign 8 deals to boost ties
- Sanjay Dutt spends restless nights as officials yet to decide on his jail
- Aarushi murder case: Rajesh Talwar claims he was asleep when killings took place
- Railgate: BJP protests against CBI DIG for shielding Pawan Bansal
Terming as "retrogade" and "highly discriminatory" the recent UPSC notification on regional langauges, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa today said they appeared "to be calculated to bias the system against Civil Service aspirants from non-Hindi speaking regions".
In a strongly-worded letter to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, she said the four major changes announced by UPSC would "adversely affect" the interests of students from Tamil Nadu, particularly those from rural backgrounds.
"I apprehend that these retrograde changes brought in by the UPSC without adequate consultation with state governments are undemocratic and unilateral and will have the effect of unfairly denying the youth of Tamil Nadu their fair chance of representation in the Civil Services, and ultimately, hamper the governance of the country.
"I urge you to intervene in the matter and prevail on the UPSC to reconsider these invidious, unfair and discriminatory changes made in the scheme of the Civil Services Examination," she said.
Referring to the changes, she said the new stipulation that the Main Examination including optional papers can be written in Tamil only if the candidates had studied in that medium up to the graduation level denies them the opportunity to write the examination in their mother tongue Tamil.
She pointed out this, however, did not apply for those who wished to appear in Hindi medium. While both Tamil and Hindi were in the 8th Schedule of the Constitution, the UPSC move clearly 'discriminates' against not just Tamil speaking, but against all candidates from the non-Hindi states, she said.
"This is violative of Articles 14 and 16 of Constitution of India and places such candidates at a disadvantage compared to those students writing the examination in English or Hindi."
She also criticised the change pertaining to choosing literature of a language as optional paper, minimum requirement of 25 candidates for writing the examination in a particular language and inclusion of an English composition and précis writing section as an evaluated portion of Essay paper instead of qualifying English.
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- If found guilty, BCCI to ask ICC to erase Sreesanth records
- Top cops among 42 named in death of blast accused
- Manmohan-Li talks: PM takes tough line on incursion issue
- Security forces blame Maoists, villagers say CoBRA man was killed in 'friendly fire'