Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Joint statement, different interpretations

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Pakistan hails the joint statement as its victory because resumption of dialogue is not specifically linked to terrorism and Mumbai 26/11 attacks and also because of mention of Baluchistan. The Indian side is happy that the buzzword Kashmir does not find a place in the statement. According to the Indian interpretation, it is implicit in the joint statement that for meaningful resumption of dialogue, Pakistan must furnish concrete evidence of action against those who planned and carried out the Mumbai terror attacks. These divergent interpretations are reminiscent of lawyers interpreting the same Supreme Court judgment as supportive of their case.

    Words have always conveyed different meanings to different people. The various Protestant sects based on different interpretations of the Bible exemplify the point. There are erudite texts on principles of interpretation of statutes and deeds. However in Alice in Wonderland, Humpty Dumpty said in a scornful tone, “When I use a word it means just what I choose it to mean, neither more nor less”. When Alice asked how words could mean so many different things, Humpty Dumpty said, “The question is which is to be the master—that is all”.

    Ads by Google

    It must be realised that the question is not one of defeat or victory for India or Pakistan but that in view of the prevalent domestic and international ground realities, jettisoning dialogue with Pakistan is not a pragmatic option.

    Art and spiritual censorship

    When in London, my pilgrimage is to the Poets Corner in Westminster Abbey. Almost every major English poet is either buried or remembered in the Abbey’s Poets’ Corner. The Dean decides the admissions into the Poets’ Corner. Some moralistic deans have excluded many eminent literary personalities. Lord Byron who died in Greece was refused an Abbey burial on account of what the Dean called his ‘open profligacy—an obstacle to his commemoration’ and had to wait until 1969 for his memorial. Thomas Hardy in his 1924 poem, A Refusal, satirised the Dean and specifically requested that he should not be buried in the Abbey but near his family in Dorset. However, when Hardy died, his agent arranged a grand funeral and after much argument Hardy was buried in the Abbey—except for his heart, which was taken to Dorset in a biscuit tin and buried in the churchyard of St. Michael’s, Stinsford. Another victim of spiritual censure was George Eliot, pseudonym for May Ann Evans, for whom an Abbey memorial was initially rejected owing to her agnosticism and the fact that she lived, unmarried, with a man. DH Lawrence’s memorial appeared belatedly in 1985.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    joint declarationBy: dinesh | 19-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Sir, Please do not try to whitewash matters - this has been one of the many gaffes committed by the present govt - with many more to come. You are here trying to tell us that - it was allright that India will investigate the claims of Pak regarding India sponsored terrorism in Balochisthan , and it is okay to delink talks to action on terrorism. If it were so - pray why did we not talk to them during the past 8 months? Try to send terrorists into any self respecting country - you will have that country fight back by all means with all forces at its command. Here we are - trying to justify the PM's decision to talk to a hostile neighbor - despite pak - not taking any action to contain terrorism
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.