Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Gujarat High Court reinstates Additional Sessions Judge after 10 years

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • S J Pathak was suspended in 1999 on corruption charges

    Judges are at times poor judges of Judges, especially in judicial administration, this case reveals,” observed the Division Bench of the Gujarat High Court comprising Chief Justice K S Radhakrishnan and Justice A S Shah on Friday.

    The observation came while setting aside the order of a Disciplinary Committee of the HC to dismiss an Additional Sessions Judge on corruption charges.

    In the landmark judgement, the HC not only reinstated the dismissed judge, but also asked the court to pay him Rs 15,000 towards legal expenses incurred by him.

    Additional Sessions Judge S J Pathak was suspended in October 1999 while serving in Godhra, on charges of misconduct. A departmental inquiry was initiated against him and he was subsequently served two chargesheets relating to certain accusations against him during his earlier postings in Junagadh and Bharuch. Pathak was accused of granting bail to some people charged with serious offences, allegedly in return for considerations and gratifications.

    Ads by Google

    Following this, the HC appointed another judge, Bela Trivedi, as Enquiry Officer in both the cases against Pathak. In her report, Trivedi concluded that the charges levelled against the judge had not been proved. Trivedi’s report said Pathak had passed various orders in “utter disregard and in ignorance of settled legal position’’.

    The report was placed before the Disciplinary Committee consisting Justices B J Shethna and D K Trivedi. But the committee disagreed with the report of the Enquiry Officer and directed the concerned office to issue notice to Pathak to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed from service.

    ... contd.

    Next123
    Justice Served Well !!By: Pk Sheth | 08-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward It's kind of surprise and feel sorry to see the comments from Niranjan that instead of trusting the judiciary system,he chooses to blame the judge who has been proven innocent by the system. Does he even know the false charges takes it's toll- physical,mental,financial and social on the person as well the family? " Bhagvan ke gur der hey andhar nai"
    JUSTICE!By: NIRANJAN | 07-Nov-2009 Reply | Forward IT GOES TO SHOW THAT IF YOU ARE READY TO WAIT A LONG TIME, YOU CAN BE DECLARED INNOCENT, NO MATTER HOW HEINOUS A CRIME YOU HAVE COMMITTED. ALSO, WHEN THE RIGHT PEOPLE OR PARTY COME TO POWER, YOU CAN BE CERTAIN TO GET AWAY WITH IT. THIS WAY THE JUDGE GOT PAID FOR SITTING AT HOME AND ALSO GOT HIS RANK AND ALL THE BENEFITS FOR NOTHING. WHAT JUSTICE!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.