Juvenile Board rejects Swamy's plea seeking trial of juvenile along with accused adults
Related
Top Stories
- Spot-fixing: Petition in SC seeks stay on IPL matches, seeks SIT probe
- India, China call for end to incursion issue, sign 8 deals to boost ties
- Sanjay Dutt spends restless nights as officials yet to decide on his jail
- Aarushi murder case: Rajesh Talwar claims he was asleep when killings took place
- Railgate: BJP protests against CBI DIG for shielding Pawan Bansal

The Juvenile Board on Thursday rejected Subramanian Swamy's plea seeking trial of juvenile accused in December 16 gangrape-murder case along with the adult accused.
The Board presided over by Principal Magistrate Geetanjali Goel on Wednesday had reserved its order on the petition filed by Janata Party president seeking that no leniency be shown to juvenile as his act was brutal and crime committed by him shows that it was not the action of a juvenile.
Swamy had submitted that the juvenile be prosecuted like all the other co-accused in the case. Seeking directions to stay the proceedings of the case before it, Swamy had referred to the "discrepancies" between the Juvenile Justice (JJ) Act and the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
"The JJ Act terms those above 18 as adults, while the IPC says its 12," Swamy said adding "The concept of criminal responsibility needs to be added into the Act and allow the court to differentiate between innocent children and juvenile delinquents".
Swamy had said that the JJ Act is a piece of beneficial legislation which has been formulated to protect the innocence of children and its youth and it should not be applied in a brutal gangrape and murder case.
"In the current case the extreme malice and depravity with which the accused has allegedly committed the crime shows that it is not the action of a juvenile, who the law supposes to be of tender age and mind and not fully capable of being responsible for his actions, but rather these are actions of the most evil of men for whom this beneficial legislation clearly is not meant," he had said.
Swamy also moved the Delhi High Court seeking a direction to prosecute the sole juvenile along with five adult accused, saying the waiver from prosecution to such minors was "unreasonable".
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- If found guilty, BCCI to ask ICC to erase Sreesanth records
- Top cops among 42 named in death of blast accused
- Manmohan-Li talks: PM takes tough line on incursion issue
- Security forces blame Maoists, villagers say CoBRA man was killed in 'friendly fire'
- Travellers’ nightmare: Yellow fever vaccine stocks run out, production unit awaits repair


Pawar to seek special package for state
Verdict in Dec 16 rape case expected by month-end: Neeraj Kumar
China incursion: Both sides withdraw troops from Daulat Beg Oldi sector
Sonia Gandhi consults A K Antony on Pawan Bansal issue




















