Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Krishna, Shashi take note: How nine of your colleagues live

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • While External Affairs Minister S M Krishna and his deputy Shashi Tharoor turned 5-star hotel suites into temporary homes, their nine colleagues, still waiting for official accommodation, settled for single rooms in state Bhawans and PSU guest houses in New Delhi.

    1. Minister of State for Agriculture K V Thomas, one of the nine, moved to his official residence at 17, Balwant Rai Mehta Lane this morning. Work at his new house is still not over — “at least 20 per cent of work is still remaining but then that’s how the CPWD works.”

    “I was staying at Kerala House. It is in such a dilapidated state. First, I had viral fever and then I was down with meningitis. So I shifted to a guest house of the Indian Council of Agricultural Research where I had a one-room accommodation,” Thomas said.

    2. MoS Home Mullappally Ramachandran, also from Kerala, is still in Kerala House. An official in his team said he was “ready to shift to the allotted residence at Sunehri Bagh... renovation work is still on.”

    Ads by Google

    3. Vilasrao Deshmukh, former Maharashtra Chief Minister and now Union Minister for Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises, is still at a BHEL guest house in Asiad Village. The Rajya Sabha House Allotment Committee allotted him 14, Akbar Road but it is still occupied by former Union Minister Mani Shankar Aiyar.

    “Aiyar had sought an extension from the committee and Deshmukh agreed to let him stay on. The deadline for Aiyar’s stay ended on September 7. We have still not heard anything about him leaving,” said a Deshmukh aide.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    shashi tharoor and "holy cows"By: dilish | 17-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward nehru family has been living like a royals because they inherited the party and the country!!Sonia's mother and buddy quterochi are living like royals because of Indian taxpayers. Priyanka and Rahul have been supported by Indian taxpayers for 40 odd years. Why do 'adult' children (Priyanka and Rahul) of a former PM need to be protected this long. It costs crores of rupees to maintain them when millions of Indian can use the money for basic needs. The austerity that Sonia shows to the public is fake. For Rahul's Birthday party, the whole family travels to London to celebrate. Ordinary Indians who are really austere cannot afford to travel to London. There is more than 1000 security people working for protecting a single persons of this royal family (Sonia , Rahul
    AUSTERE MPsBy: Govind | 17-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward I wonder why this publicity stunt called austerity drive.But a more serious concern is the implication behind this move that our representatives have been splashing out tax payers money all these years.This publicity has done a good thing in bringing that to people's notice.But to add to that ,it is actually causing more trouble to 'ordinary class' passengers and ordinary people.Even media should have restrained from this hyped austerity measures.
    Austere MPsBy: Vidyashankar | 17-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Its absurd to ask these people err. MPs to be austere. Imagine the inconvenience Rahul baba or Sonia Gandhi would have caused to the other passengers ( in the train or flight ) and imagine the extra cost in security for these travels !!. Glass Dolls are to be placed in showcases, not to be rough handled !
    AUSTERE MPsBy: NIRANJAN | 11-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward HOW ABOUT THE REST OF THE 500 MPs. HOW IS THEIR LIFESTYLE? 9 MPs DON'T MAKE THE ENTIRE HOUSE!
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.