Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

K-word out but big B-word in: Balochistan

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Manmohan-gilani
    PM Manmohan Singh shakes hands with his Pak counterpart Yousaf Raza Gilani during a bilateral meeting at Sharm-el-Sheikh in Egypt.

    A reference to “threats” in Balochistan in the joint Indo-Pak statement, issued in Egypt today, marks a significant departure from India’s long-held position on the ethnic unrest in Pakistan’s largest state even as Prime Minister Manmohan Singh tried to justify the reference by saying New Delhi has nothing to hide since its policy in the region was “an open book”.

    Seasoned diplomats expressed surprise and concern over the inclusion of Balochistan in the statement, the first time that the issue has found a mention in any joint statement issued by the two countries.

    “This is an indirect acknowledgement by New Delhi that India has a hand in what is going on in Balochistan,” said Brajesh Mishra, the National Security Advisor and Principal Secretary to the Prime Minister in the NDA government. Mishra went on to denounce the joint statement on another count, on the assertion that action on terrorism should not be linked to the composite dialogue process between the two countries.

    Ads by Google

    “The fact that terrorism will not come in the way of talks is contrary to assurances given by the government to Parliament including the January 6, 2009 statement by the Prime Minister. This is a complete victory of Pakistan’s diplomatic establishment,” he said.

    Former Foreign Secretary Lalit Mansingh was equally critical of the Balochistan reference. “Pakistan, perhaps, will be able to score some brownie points on this from its domestic audience. But this is an absolutely absurd theory that India has any involvement in the terror activities in Balochistan,” he said.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Traitor PMBy: Hero Vaz | 13-Aug-2009 Reply | Forward MMS is a traitor. Only in India, a traitor can be the prime minister - with the support of an Italian woman who finds him the easiest to use to fulfil her one point programme of seeing her son as PM.
    Dancing on ISI's TunesBy: H Baloch | 19-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Its seems that Paki international terrorist ISI made india to dance on their tune too, people of Balochistan have great respect for India, let it be that way, dont drag Balochistan's fight for independence into your so called peace talks,there is no such word peace in Pakistani army's dictionary.
    India has to be thereBy: Baloch | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward World is in an era when the West and Alqaeda and Taleban are at eachothers throat. This quarrell resulted in overlooking crimes against humanity in Srilanka against Tamils, in Iran against Baloch and Kurds, in Pakistan against Baluch, in Iraq against the Sunnis and so on.In such a situation, presence of India as a defender of the helpless like Baloch is vital. This role of India will deter criminal authorities of Pakistan to change the current oppression into a genocide of Baloch.
    Jointstatement of Pakistani and Indian Prime MinistersBy: PRKASH NARAIN | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Whether Manmohan Singh slipped; the truth will be known to historians. India has experience.Remember Nehru threatened disciplinary action against the Brigadier guiding Indian forces in Kashmir during 1947-48 war if he did not immediately call ceasefire. The Brigadier had asked Nehru to wait for a week or so because he had entered the crucial stage of getting the entire Pak Occupied Kashmir (PoK) vacated. But the helpless Brigadier had to toe Nehru’s line. Had Nehru agreed with the wise general, the more than half a century long tension would have been avoided and thousands not massacred.The Brigadier who asked Nehru for a little time to get PoK cleared of the Pakitistani forces was Briadier (later Lt. General) L.P Sen who described the incident in his book ‘Slender was the Thread.’Prakash Narainauthor at indianpjilosophy.cc
    Another Diplomatic Blunder By Congress GovernmentBy: Anil Gupta | 17-Jul-2009 Reply | Forward Sir, In fifties in a letter sent by Jawaharlal Nehru to his counterpart in China on Tibet while conceding China's suzernity over Tibet SOVEREGNITY was inadvertently typed in place of SUZERNITY which made all the difference in future Indian policy on Tibet.Manmohan Singh has committed a serious blunder by including Balochistan in the joint communique.Country will have to pay a heavy price for this blunder.What our foreign secretary Menon was doing there?
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.