Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Labour Ministry overlooks PM’s directives

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Specifically, the DEA wants to reiterate and put its view on the EPF rate debate on the record. “The payment of the rate of interest has to be on the basis of the earnings on the assets and there should be a balance between these two components. Hence, the payment of interest cannot exceed the earnings,” the DEA’s letter stresses.

    Moreover, on the equity investment proposal, a suggestion made by the Finance Ministry was also not taken note of. In order to better understand the impact of equity investments on the EPF’s earnings, the Finance Ministry official had “suggested that a study may be carried out about the private funds (PF trusts) that have invested in equity and the consequent returns”. The DEA has asked the Labour Ministry to incorporate this suggestion in the minutes as well.

    The revised investment pattern that allows upto five per cent investment of EPF monies in stocks was notified back in January 2005. To counter the objections from employee representatives on the board, the PM had advised Fernandes to tell the board, “You want a higher interest rate for EPF, but when it comes to making investments, you block any proposals that can help earn higher returns”.

    Ads by Google

    After November 7, the EPF board has met one more time earlier this month, but neither of the two issues could be resolved as Fernandes had to leave the meeting midway. Another meeting is scheduled in early January.

    Previous12
    Comments
    Post comment

    Be the first to comment.

    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.