Land Bill can’t leave ground for ambiguity
Top Stories
- IPL spot-fixing case: Actor Vindoo Dara Singh arrested in Mumbai
- Supreme Court rules out ban on IPL matches, slams BCCI over spot-fixing
- Li Keqiang pitches for more Chinese investments as he backs trade balance
- Narendra Modi holds talks with Advani ahead of BJP's strategy meeting in Delhi
- Aarushi murder case: HC rejects Talwars' plea to examine 14 witnesses
The issue of doing away with the archaic 1894 Land Acquisition Act has gone through another set of motions — considered by the Cabinet, Parliamentary Standing Committee and Group of Ministers, just as during UPA I.
The debate around it has been portrayed as a tussle between being pro-farmer or pro-industry, or striking a balance between the two. Political stakeholders — ranging from Mamata Banerjee to Rahul Gandhi — have taken public positions mostly on the basis of political expediency.
However, political expediency should not be the guide for a futuristic long-lasting legislation. Nor should the Bill aim to please Sonia Gandhi or Rahul or agriculture or industry. Actually, a land acquisition legislation should not be expected to save agriculture, or promote urbanisation and industrialisation — there could be separate policies and laws for that.
What a land acquisition Bill should instead lay down are clear, transparent, fair, least-discretionary and time-bound rules and procedures for transactions between a group of owners and those seeking to acquire their land.
The Bill should ensure that acquisitions get a transparent closure and do not continue to fester, leaving no room for ambiguities and opaque discretionary provisions. Violations of procedures by either party should be penalised. This will be in the interest of both the parties.
With compensation likely to remain a contentious issue given that the floor levels of relief fixed today in the legislation may become obsolete soon in a growing economy like ours, the Bill should have provisions either for updating itself or have scope for negotiations between owners and those acquiring land for a market-based price. The Congress asserts the Bill is very much part of its political agenda. However, given the task at hand, one can only keep one's fingers crossed in it making through the current Lok Sabha.
... contd.
Editors’ Pick
- 'Sophisticated' Indian cyberattacks targeted Pak military sites: Report
- Talkative Li quoted Weber, Hegel, Jobs, said PM is large-hearted
- Bihar food corp ends up with chaff as rice worth Rs 535 cr vanishes from mills
- In 7 lucrative minutes on May 9, Sreesanth bowled 6 balls, bookie made Rs 2.5 cr
- India and China ask border envoys to work on more steps
- Former Ranji player among 3 more held
- Rajasthan Royals to file FIR against tainted trio
- Family of theft accused allege police torture
- After Khalid’s death, Muslim leaders want govt to make Nimesh panel report public
- Meteoroid impact triggers bright flash on the moon
- Cobrapost sting: NABARD chief gives clean chit to co-operative banks
- Google Maps leads Chinese man abducted 23 years ago back home


Mumbai housing prices appreciate by 66% in 4 yrs
Home prices near most affordable levels in over 30 yrs: HDFC
Low-cost housing: Want cheaper funds, and more
It’s home sweat home for these Mhada lottery winners




















