Last ditch bid to abort CBI plea to close Bofors case made

Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi allegedly received kickbacks in Bofors gun deal.

A Delhi court,examining the CBI plea to close the case against Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi who allegedly received kickbacks in Bofors gun deal,was told on Saturday of all the reasons for which the agency wanted to challenge the Delhi High Court’s dropping of charges against the Hinduja brothers and continue the case.

Lest the High Court’s remark in its May 2005 ruling on Hinduja brothers that probing the case has already cost Rs 250 to the exchequer ends up influencing the trial court in deciding the CBI plea in Quattrocchi case,advocate Ajay Agrawal,opposing the plea,said CBI itself had termed the HC remarks in the case as “superfluous.”

Agrawal made his submission in a fresh application to the court of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Vinod Yadav,who reserved his judgment on the CBI plea for Monday.

Story continues below this ad

During its last hearing on February 10 on the CBI plea,the trial court had indicated that the high court’s remarks on probe into Bofors gun deal case costing Rs 250 crore to exchequer may be a significant factor in its ruling.

“There also seems to be a superfluous remark that investigation (into the Bofors) case cost the exchequer nearly Rs 250 crores,” said advocate Agrawal quoting the Bofors case investigation officer and CBI’s erstwhile Superintendent of Police Keshav Mishra countering the high court’s observation in the 2005 ruling.

Agrawal pointed out to the court that Mishra had made his remarks in an internal departmental evaluation of the high court’s ruling while exploring the grounds to challenge it.

The advocate also annexed his application with relevant extracts from the CBI’s internal notings.

Story continues below this ad

Agrawal said he had been told by a former CBI Director that the figure of Rs 250 crores “may be 20 to 30 times more than the amount spent on Bofors investigation and the actual figure may be less than five crores or so”.

“To say that a large amount of Rs 250 crore has been spent on the investigation….is totally wrong and a superfluous remark in the High Court’s order,” Agrawal said in application.

The court had earlier asked the CBI to give a rough estimate of the amount being spent in the investigation of this case.

“Do we have any rough calculation how much money has been spent on this case? Is the figure of around Rs 250 crore,mentioned in the Delhi High Court’s order,correct?,” CMM Yadav had asked the CBI.

Stay updated with the latest - Click here to follow us on Instagram