Even now, Musharraf claims that his authority to amend the constitution derives from a Supreme Court ruling, confirming his desire to keep the judiciary subservient to the executive. There is no recognition of the basic logic that the judicature, which has the right to interpret but not to amend the constitution, simply cannot confer a right it does not have itself on someone else.

In the past, the military or civilian executive have constantly circumscribed the legislature in its functions. Political parties operated in the shadow of larger than life figures, slandered, jailed or exiled with alarming frequency. And then there were the ubiquitous intelligence agencies, hidden from public view but frequently seen pulling the strings in Pakistan’s complex political drama.

If the new parliament is to represent a new beginning for the country then political parties must be given an opportunity to operate without the constraints of the past. The legislature and political parties are

important institutions and, along with the judiciary and media, they are essential for Pakistan’s evolution into a normal, functioning democracy.

Given the result of the February 18 election, and the army’s critical decision to disassociate itself from politics, Musharraf simply cannot expect to rule Pakistan with a veneer of elected, albeit powerless, institutions.

Pakistan has aspired for democratic rule since its inception. It should by now have become obvious to all that various plans for controlled democracy have compounded Pakistan’s problems.

True democracy facilitates peaceful removal from power as well as the prospect of returning to it. Losing office while respecting dissent and accepting the role of national institutions is not as bad as risking everything. Instead of trying to impose or manipulate the fulfillment of his will by creating new polarisation, Musharraf should work with parliament and let the constitutional democratic process take its course.

... contd.