Sign In / Register
Make This My Home Page | Feedback |RSS
You are here: IE »   Story

Limits of freedom: Where do they lie?

  • Print
  • Mail This Article
  • Comments
  • Add to favorites
  • Two years ago, self-styled moral policemen stormed into an exam of the famous Arts Faculty of the Maharaja Sayaji University at Vadodara. A student, Chandra Mohan, was arrested, and the acting dean of the faculty, the well known art historian Shivaji Pannikar, was suspended. Pannikar’s suspension recently went to a university-level tribunal; it has been reported that some more art pieces have now become a point of contention in the faculty’s exam. Fortunately, outsiders are not permitted into the process.

    I was asked at one stage to look into the earlier set of incidences by a high-level university authority. Inspite of advice to stay out, I took it on. My state and my country have been kind to me, and I have considerable academic and public experience. My take was that if people like me back out, who will guard the guards, as the Latin proverb asked.

    It turned out to be one of the more difficult and nerve-wracking experiences I have had. I didn’t particularly like the pieces of art myself and could clearly see that they would be offensive to many people. But this was a university -- one that at one stage had a great reputation. It could, I believed, well manage come back some day. Also, it was a great arts school.

    Ads by Google

    I remember listening, as a young man, to the late Chanchi Mehta playing out Kalidasa’s Shakuntalam all by himself in the course of a private evening. There were others, some of whom are still alive, who made it a great seat of learning. Universities are places where the unacceptable has to be tolerated, because genuine societal progress is made by those who think out of the box, and seldom by those who accept the status quo. Prakash Karat, Sitaram Yechuri and Arun Shourie are all known to me from the time they were in the university. They challenged orthodoxy in a most unacceptable manner when they were students and yet, in some sense, they set the debate. India would have been poorer if they had not been allowed to take their exams or their teachers had been suspended for years.

    ... contd.

    Next12
    Jyoti Raychaudhuri By: Adnan | 16-May-2009 Reply | Forward This is soooo typical of Hindus except Bengalis…right!! Ram Mohan Roy, Vivekanand, Tagore…). Do you know any other Indian reformers who were born Hindus but not Bengalis.Your outlook of (typical) Hindus is derived from distorted and perverted depiction of Hinduism by hypocrite Indian communist. How can you believe in someone who claims to be an atheist but attends Durga Pujo. Step out of West Bengal and you would realize how open minded, liberal and tolerant Hinduism is and has been. That is why even today groups like Shivsen, Bajrang dal, VHP and BJP don’t have a wider Hindus support base. But does tolerance mean let people rape your culture while others enjoy immunity.OH my ill-fated country......
    AdnanBy: Jyoti Raychaudhuri | 01-Sep-2009 Reply | Forward Hindus - open-minded, liberal, tolerant? What a joke.I guess that is why Buddhism was banished from India? First stop raping your own culture and others will follow suit. As for the role communism and Bengalis, there is no point having an intelligent discussion with somebody so ignorant.
    MrBy: Kuldeep | 15-May-2009 Reply | Forward There are many villages where different sects of Hindu religion have active presnece but when question comes of Dalit's entry in hindu temple all are turning their faces and giving one or the other reason to escape.
    Tolerance has to be two sidedBy: S.M.Singru | 15-May-2009 Reply | Forward To start with, I agree with Yoginder that Universities are places where the unacceptable has to be tolerated. My point is that the tolerance mentioned by Yoginder must work both ways, and changes in society should not be directed only at a specific community, particularly when it is obvious that there are other communities which could be obscurantist and perverse in their beliefs.So if M.F.Hussain is within his artistic privilege to draw a painting of Goddess Saraswati in the nude, then people like me, who revere Prophet Mohammed ardently, and feel like satisfying their human urge to see him as he existed and lived, by seeing a painting of the Prophet, fully clad, as done by one of his worshippers should not be an anathema to anybody,merely because some bigots regard drawing a painting of Prophet Mohammed as utter blasphemy punishable with death. Intolerance is in practicing beliefs which are conveniently one sided
    Psuedo SecularistsBy: Balabalan | 15-May-2009 Reply | Forward The so called Liberals and Secularists make a hue and cry only when the Moral Police are Hindus. They are no where to be seen or heard when it is done by Muslims. Examples are aplenty. I am a Hindu but not a chauvinist. I hardly ever go to a temple. But looking around me and seeing the so called sensible and educated people falling head or heels to condemn anything and everything associated with Hinduism gives me the creeps. Slowly and steadily the world is being taken over by Muslim fundamentalists and these so called secularists are not seeing that. Jyothi R says it is so typical of Hindus and that we never had a concept of mental freedom in Hinduism. Thats the joke of the Century. It at all there has been any mental freedom in any religion it is and was only in Hinduism. It is one of the reasons that people like her can write against the majority religion in this country and still wake up alive the next day and walk free. Try that in a Islamic State.
    Let the observer decide !By: Naim Naqvi | 15-May-2009 Reply | Forward To me art and literature are meant to challenge our perceptive faculties. No one had the right to draw the lines of demarcations. For some "Khajraho" and "Ajanta" could be highly offensive, to some "Satanic verses" is distressing. I say - well, your opinions are respectable but not acceptable. If you don't like some creation, just ignore it. Throw the book in the dustbin and never talk about the author. If you have knowledge and courage, write a rebuttal. If some painting or movie doesn't qualify your moral standard, don't stand there. Get out and be happy. Please don't force your biases upon others. We have a parliament and we have the most comprehensive constitution in the world. Mold the public opinion in a democratic way if you want to have your way. A glass of cider may be medicine for you, a pint a cider may be intoxicating to the other. No one should be allowed to stymie the creativity in the name of Pornography and blasphemy. Let the viewer or reader decide. Caviet emptor !
    Post a Comment
    Name:
    Email:
    Title:
    Maximum characters allowed     
    Comment:
    TERMS OF USE:
    The views, opinions and comments posted are your, and are not endorsed by this website. You shall be solely responsible for the comment posted here. The website reserves the right to delete, reject, or otherwise remove any views, opinions and comments posted or part thereof. You shall ensure that the comment is not inflammatory, abusive, derogatory, defamatory &/or obscene, or contain pornographic matter and/or does not constitute hate mail, or violate privacy of any person (s) or breach confidentiality or otherwise is illegal, immoral or contrary to public policy. Nor should it contain anything infringing copyright &/or intellectual property rights of any person(s).
    I agree to the terms of use.